The role of parent and child catastrophizing in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease pain and functioning
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parent behaviours are an important predictor of a child's report of pain intensity in IBD samples.
“Moreover, parent behaviours have also been shown to be an important predictor of a child’s report of pain intensity in IBD samples [8,9,10].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahola Kohut, S., Martincevic, I., Turrell, S. L., Church, P. C., Walters, T. D., Weiser, N., & Iuliano, A. (2021) · Children · doi:10.3390/children8050396 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sicard, M., Campbell, C., Quartana, P., Oliva-Hemker, M., & Haythornthwaite, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- S19
- ISSN
- 1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099522374
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- pain catastrophizing, pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, abdominal pain, parent-reported pain, functioning, psychosocial factors, disease severity, IBD activity, functional abdominal pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
