A Pilot Study of the Experience of Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Using a Mixed Methods Approach
Open accessAbstract
Context Pancreatic cancer presents a wide spectrum of significant symptomatology. The high symptom burden, coupled with a rapidly fatal diagnosis, limits preparation or time for adjustment for both patients and their family caregivers. From the initial diagnosis and throughout the illness experience, the physical and emotional demands of caregiving can predispose caregivers themselves to illness and a greater risk of mortality. Understanding the negative and positive aspects of caregiving for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will inform interventions that promote positive caregiver outcomes and support caregivers in their role. Objectives To provide feasibility data for a larger, mixed methods, longitudinal study focused on the experience of family caregivers of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and preliminary qualitative data to substantiate the significance of studying this caregiver population. Methods This was a mixed methods study guided by the Stress Process Model. Eight family caregivers of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer from oncology practices of a university-affiliated medical center were surveyed. Results The pilot results supported the ability to recruit and retain participants and informed recruitment and data collection procedures. The qualitative results provided preliminary insights into caregiver experiences during the diagnosis and treatment phases. Key findings that substantiated the significance of studying these caregivers include…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five included studies were conducted in the USA, three in Australia, and one in Denmark.
“Five studies (three qualitative, two quantitative) were conducted in the USA [5, 28, 29, 31, 33], three (two qualitative, one quantitative) in Australia [27, 30, 32] and one quantitative study in Denmark [6].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Eight included studies were cross-sectional studies and one study was a prospective cohort design.
“Eight studies were cross-sectional studies [5, 27–33]. One study was a prospective cohort design [6].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
From a maximum of 22 points, three qualitative studies scored 17 points and two scored 18 points.
“From a maximum of 22 points, three studies scored 17 points [27–30] and two studies scored 18 points [31].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Data was collected through questionnaires alone in four studies, semi-structured interviews with individual participants in three studies, focus groups in two studies, and questionnaire and semi-structured interview together in one study.
“Data was collected through questionnaires alone in four studies [5, 32, 33], semi-structured interviews with individual participants in three studies [29–31], focus groups in two studies [27, 28] and questionnaire and semi-structured interview together in one study [29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Informal caregivers of pancreatic cancer patients have an unmet need for help with navigating the health care system.
“Two studies raised the need for help with navigating health systems [28, 29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Guilt also arose when patients developed treatment side effects as caregivers viewed themselves as responsible in causing the side effects due to their role in supporting patients to receive treatment.
“Guilt also arose when patients developed treatment side effects as caregivers viewed themselves as responsible in causing the side effects due to their role in supporting patients to receive treatment [29, 30].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Four studies reported qualitative data on unmet needs of informal caregivers of pancreatic cancer patients, and no quantitative data on unmet needs was available.
“Four studies reported qualitative data on unmet needs of informal caregivers [27–29, 31]. No quantitative data was available on unmet needs.”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The lack of consideration for the relationship between researcher and participants and unsatisfactory data analysis were the two most frequent reasons points were deducted during quality assessments.
“The lack of consideration for the relationship between researcher and participants [30, 31] and unsatisfactory data analysis [27–30] were the two most frequent reasons points were deducted during quality assessments.”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Informal caregivers of pancreatic cancer patients have an unmet need for better clinical communication.
“Two studies raised the need for better clinical communication [27, 29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Informal caregivers experienced guilt for pressuring patients to adhere to a dietary regimen or treatment plan.
“Apart from inability to control symptoms, informal caregivers also experienced guilt for pressuring patients to adhere to a dietary regimen or treatment plan [29, 30].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Three studies contained qualitative data illustrating caregiver burden.
“Three studies contained qualitative data illustrating caregiver burden [28–30].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Informal caregivers suggested a need for 'a point person to serve as coordinator'.
“They suggested there was a need for ‘a point person to serve as coordinator’ [29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Some informal caregivers reported unsatisfactory communication of medical decisions and rationales.
“Unsatisfactory communication of medical decisions and rationales was reported by some informal caregivers [29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Cancer patients tend to experience severe symptoms more frequently and have a sharper decline in quality-of-life compared to other chronic diseases, particularly in pancreatic cancer.
“Cancer patients tend to experience severe symptoms more frequently and to have a sharper decline in quality-of-life when compared to other chronic diseases [29]; this is particularly true in pancreatic cancer [2].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Timing of delivery of diagnosis was problematic, with the possibility of cancer not mentioned until after surgery.
“Timing of delivery of diagnosis was also problematic with the possibility of cancer not mentioned ‘until after the surgery’ [29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Healthcare policies and reforms in many countries now prioritize patients taking a more active role in self-managing their illness; to effectively self-manage, patients need support, and that support often comes from a family member or friends.
“Healthcare policies and reforms in many countries now prioritize patients taking a more active role in (self-)managing their illness [29]; to effectively self-manage, patients need support, and that support often comes from a family member or friends [29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Health institutes' policies increasingly push for shorter length of hospital stay and more outpatient care, thus placing greater responsibility on partners and families to supplement care received from professionals.
“Furthermore, health institutes’ policies also increasingly push for shorter length of hospital stay and more outpatient care thus placing greater responsibility on partners and families to supplement care received from professionals [29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Informal caregivers reported ineffective patient-clinician communication, including inconsistent advice and information overload or underload.
“Informal caregivers reported ineffective patient-clinician communication by mentioning, ‘inconsistent advice’ and ‘information overload [or] underload’ [29].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Sherman, D. W., McGuire, D. B., Free, D., & Cheon, J. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sherman, Deborah W.
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-399.e2
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145266938
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Maryland
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- family caregivers, advanced pancreatic cancer, caregiver experiences, caregiver stress, stress process model, coping strategies, caregiver support interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Family, Feasibility Studies, Patient Care, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, United States, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review