Primary Care Pediatricians' Satisfaction with Subspecialty Care, Perceived Supply, and Barriers to Care
Abstract
Objectives To compare satisfaction with specialty care by primary care pediatricians (PCPs), perceived barriers to care, and adequacy of specialist supply. Study design A survey of U.S. pediatricians was conducted in 2007. PCPs were asked about satisfaction with specialty care for their patients, as well as supply of specific pediatric subspecialists. Responses of rural and nonrural PCPs were compared regarding 10 potential barriers to care. Results Most PCPs are satisfied with the quality of subspecialty care. However, they were not satisfied with wait times for appointments, and the availability of many pediatric medical subspecialties and several pediatric surgical specialties. Rural PCPs were significantly more likely to report these shortages compared with nonrural pediatricians; these included 9 of the 18 medical and 5 of the 7 surgical specialties. In addition to wait times for appointments, PCPs reported that subspecialists' nonparticipation in health insurance plans and lack of acceptance of uninsured patients were also barriers to obtaining subspecialty care for their patients. Conclusions PCPs provide valuable insight into access to the pediatric subspecialty workforce. This survey of PCPs raises significant concerns about the adequacy of children's access to pediatric subspecialists, especially in rural communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More than 80% of primary care pediatricians reported that there were too few pediatric dermatologists to meet the needs of patients in their practices.
“one survey revealed that more than 80% of primary care pediatricians reported that there were too few pediatric dermatologists to meet the needs of patients in their practices.4”
From Diagnostic Accuracy of Pediatric Teledermatology Using Parent-Submitted Photographs: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2017) · cites this paper as [4]
A study in pediatric PCCs found that there were significant shortages in both medical and surgical pediatric specialties, with additional barriers such as nonparticipation in insurance plans and lack of acceptance of uninsured patients.
“A study in pediatric PCCs found that there were significant shortages in both medical and surgical pediatric specialties, with additional barriers such as nonparticipation in insurance plans and lack of acceptance of uninsured patients. 17”
From The use of an artificial intelligence platform OpenEvidence to augment clinical decision-making for primary care physicians (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
There are a number of barriers to PCPs' access to specialty care provided by specialists.
“There are a number of barriers to PCPs’ access to specialty care provided by specialists. 17”
From The use of an artificial intelligence platform OpenEvidence to augment clinical decision-making for primary care physicians (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
O’Connor, D. M., Jew, O. S., Perman, M. J., Castelo-Soccio, L. A., Winston, F. K., & McMahon, P. J. (2017) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.4280 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Hurt, R. T., Stephenson, C. R., Gilman, E. A., Aakre, C. A., Croghan, I. T., Mundi, M. S., Ghosh, K., & Edakkanambeth Varayil, J. (2025) · Journal of Primary Care & Community Health · doi:10.1177/21501319251332215 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“17 A recent study found that Medicaid patients face more challenges in accessing specialty care than commercially insured patients.”
- Authors
- Pletcher, B. A., Rimsza, M. E., Cull, W. L., Shipman, S. A., Shugerman, R. P., & O'Connor, K. G.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pletcher, Beth A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1011-1015.e1
- ISSN
- 0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981358210
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Keywords
- primary care pediatricians, physician satisfaction, access to specialist care, barriers to care, urban-rural differences, appointment wait times, uninsured patients, health insurance participation, pediatric surgery
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Data Collection, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Pediatrics, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Quality of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Specialization, United States, Waiting Lists, Rural Health Services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review