Cited by 134Healthcare Systems and TechnologyGlobal Health Workforce IssuesChild and Adolescent Health

Primary Care Pediatricians' Satisfaction with Subspecialty Care, Perceived Supply, and Barriers to Care

Pletcher, Beth A., Rimsza, Mary Ellen, Cull, William L., Shipman, Scott A., Shugerman, Richard P., O'Connor, Karen G.·2010·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To compare satisfaction with specialty care by primary care pediatricians (PCPs), perceived barriers to care, and adequacy of specialist supply. Study design A survey of U.S. pediatricians was conducted in 2007. PCPs were asked about satisfaction with specialty care for their patients, as well as supply of specific pediatric subspecialists. Responses of rural and nonrural PCPs were compared regarding 10 potential barriers to care. Results Most PCPs are satisfied with the quality of subspecialty care. However, they were not satisfied with wait times for appointments, and the availability of many pediatric medical subspecialties and several pediatric surgical specialties. Rural PCPs were significantly more likely to report these shortages compared with nonrural pediatricians; these included 9 of the 18 medical and 5 of the 7 surgical specialties. In addition to wait times for appointments, PCPs reported that subspecialists' nonparticipation in health insurance plans and lack of acceptance of uninsured patients were also barriers to obtaining subspecialty care for their patients. Conclusions PCPs provide valuable insight into access to the pediatric subspecialty workforce. This survey of PCPs raises significant concerns about the adequacy of children's access to pediatric subspecialists, especially in rural communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pletcher, B. A., Rimsza, M. E., Cull, W. L., Shipman, S. A., Shugerman, R. P., & O'Connor, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Pletcher, Beth A.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
156
Issue
6
Pages
1011-1015.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981358210
Cited by
134
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
primary care pediatricians, physician satisfaction, access to specialist care, barriers to care, urban-rural differences, appointment wait times, uninsured patients, health insurance participation, pediatric surgery
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Data Collection, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Pediatrics, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Quality of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Specialization, United States, Waiting Lists, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review