Cited by 33Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsCongenital heart defects research

Health-Related Quality of Life after Open-Heart Surgery

Werner, Helene, Latal, Beatrice, Valsangiacomo Buechel, Emanuela, Beck, Ingrid, Landolt, Markus A.·2014·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To determine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 1-year-old infants with congenital heart disease (CHD), to follow-up with these children at age 4 years, and to examine predictors of HRQoL.Study design Parents of 144 infants who had undergone cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for CHD before age 6 months were prospectively included in this cohort study. Parents completed a standardized questionnaire on child HRQoL at 1 year and 4 years of age; medical data were extracted from the patients' hospital records.Results Parents reported a significant reduction of the children's physical functioning compared with healthy controls at age 1 year. At age 4 years, children with CHD had poorer cognitive functioning but better social functioning compared with healthy controls. Lower HRQoL at age 4 years was not significantly predicted by univentricular or biventricular CHD but was predicted by the presence of an underlying genetic defect, tube feeding at 1 year, and lower HRQoL at 1 year.Conclusion This study shows that HRQoL of infants and preschool-age children with CHD is impaired in physical and cognitive dimensions. Children with lower overall HRQoL at age 1 year, an underlying genetic defect, and tube feeding need to be monitored carefully to provide appropriate and timely interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.022

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werner, H., Latal, B., Valsangiacomo Buechel, E., Beck, I., & Landolt, M. A.
Affiliations
University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
164
Issue
2
Pages
254-258.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090643403
Cited by
33
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
health-related quality of life, congenital heart disease, infants, open heart surgery, physical function, cognitive function, social functioning, genetic disorders, tube feeding, predictors of quality of life
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Defects, Congenital, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Infant, Male, Postoperative Period, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review