Cited by 53Influenza Virus Research StudiesPregnancy and Medication ImpactVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

First trimester influenza vaccination and risks for major structural birth defects in offspring.

Open access
Kharbanda, Elyse Olshen, Vazquez-Benitez, Gabriela, Romitti, Paul A., Naleway, Allison L., Cheetham, T. Craig, Lipkind, Heather S., Klein, Nicola P., Lee, Grace +5 more·2017·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To examine risks for major structural birth defects in infants after first trimester inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) exposures.Study design In this observational study, we used electronic health data from 7 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites to examine risks for selected major structural defects in infants after maternal IIV exposure. Vaccine exposures for women with continuous insurance enrollment through pregnancy who delivered singleton live births between 2004 and 2013 were identified from standardized files. Infants with continuous insurance enrollment were followed to 1 year of age. We excluded mother-infant pairs with other exposures that potentially increased their background risk for birth defects. Selected cardiac, orofacial or respiratory, neurologic, ophthalmologic or otologic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and muscular or limb defects were identified from diagnostic codes in infant medical records using validated algorithms. Propensity score adjusted generalized estimating equations were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs).Results We identified 52 856 infants with maternal first trimester IIV exposure and 373 088 infants whose mothers were unexposed to IIV during first trimester. Prevalence (per 100 live births) for selected major structural birth defects was 1.6 among first trimester IIV exposed versus 1.5 among unexposed mothers. The adjusted PR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.94-1.10). Organ system-specific PRs were similar to the overall PR.Conclusion First trimester maternal IIV exposure was not associated with an increased risk for selected major structural birth defects in this large cohort of singleton live births.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.039

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Timing of influenza vaccination, including administration in the first trimester, has been repeatedly shown to be safe.

    “Impact of timing of vaccination including risk of administration in the first trimester has also been studied and repeatedly shown to be safe (Kharbanda et al., 2017).”

    From Vaccine Safety: Myths and Misinformation (2020) · cites this paper as Kharbanda et al., 2017

    The Discussion reports no increased risk of selected major structural birth defects after first-trimester influenza vaccination and describes several other studies with reassuring findings. That supports the claim of repeated study, but the evidence cited here concerns birth defects, not safety across all possible outcomes or vaccination times. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kharbanda, E. O., Vazquez-Benitez, G., Romitti, P. A., Naleway, A. L., Cheetham, T. C., Lipkind, H. S., Klein, N. P., Lee, G., Jackson, M. L., Hambidge, S. J., McCarthy, N., DeStefano, F., & Nordin, J. D.
Affiliations
  • HealthPartners (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Kharbanda, Elyse Olshen
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
187
Pages
234-239.e4
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620006863
Cited by
53
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
influenza vaccination, inactivated influenza vaccine, maternal immunization, structural birth defects, congenital malformations, vaccine safety
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review