Cited by 102Child Development and Digital TechnologySleep and related disordersImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Digital Screen Time and Pediatric Sleep: Evidence from a Preregistered Cohort Study

Przybylski, Andrew K.·2019·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To determine the extent to which time spent with digital devices predicts meaningful variability in pediatric sleep. Study design Following a preregistered analysis plan, data from a sample of American children (n = 50 212) derived from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health were analyzed. Models adjusted for child-, caregiver-, household-, and community-level covariates to estimate the potential effects of digital screen use. Results Each hour devoted to digital screens was associated with 3-8 fewer minutes of nightly sleep and significantly lower levels of sleep consistency. Furthermore, those children who complied with 2010 and 2016 American Academy of Pediatrics guidance on screen time limits reported between 20 and 26 more minutes, respectively, of nightly sleep. However, links between digital screen time and pediatric sleep outcomes were modest, accounting for less than 1.9% of observed variability in sleep outcomes. Conclusions Digital screen time, on its own, has little practical effect on pediatric sleep. Contextual factors surrounding screen time exert a more pronounced influence on pediatric sleep compared to screen time itself. These findings provide an empirically robust template for those investigating the digital displacement hypothesis as well as informing policy-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.054

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Przybylski, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Przybylski, Andrew K.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
205
Pages
218-223.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899360019
Cited by
102
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
37.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
screen time, children's sleep, sleep duration, sleep consistency, screen time limits, American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, contextual factors, child health policy
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Family Characteristics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Male, Motor Activity, Retrospective Studies, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Television, Time Factors, United States, Prevalence, Video Games, Sedentary Behavior, Self Report, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review