Cited by 30Surgical site infection preventionAntibiotic Use and ResistanceOrthopedic Infections and Treatments

Trends in the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in general pediatric surgery: are we missing the mark for both stewardship and infection prevention?

Anandalwar, Seema P., Milliren, Carly, Graham, Dionne A., Hills-Dunlap, Jonathan L., Kashtan, Mark A., Newland, Jason, Rangel, Shawn J.·2020·Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to assess compliance with antimicrobial spectrum guidelines in the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) in pediatric surgery.Methods A retrospective cohort study of children undergoing elective clean-contaminated and clean surgical procedures with foreign body implantation using the Pediatric Health Information System database (10/2015-6/2018) was performed. Compliance rates with consensus guidelines surrounding appropriate spectrum of SAP coverage were calculated for each procedure. Undertreatment was defined as the use of SAP with inappropriately narrow coverage (or omission altogether), while overtreatment was defined as inappropriately broad coverage.Results Eight procedure groups including a total of 15,708 patients were included. Overall, 44% of cases received inappropriate prophylaxis, of which 58% were considered undertreatment and 42% overtreatment. Procedures with the highest rates of overtreatment included small bowel procedures (77%), colorectal procedures (29%), and hepatobiliary procedures (20%), while the highest rates of undertreatment were associated with placement of tunneled central venous catheters and ports (43%), hepatobiliary procedures (24%), and colorectal procedures (20%).Conclusion Noncompliance with the recommended spectrum of coverage for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is common in pediatric surgery, with both over and undertreatment being common themes. Improved compliance is needed to optimize both antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention.Type of study Treatment study.Level of evidence Level III.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.057

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anandalwar, S. P., Milliren, C., Graham, D. A., Hills-Dunlap, J. L., Kashtan, M. A., Newland, J., & Rangel, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Rangel, Shawn J.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
75-79
ISSN
0022-3468 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982157935
Cited by
30
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Keywords
surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, pediatric surgery, antibiotic stewardship, infection control, undertreatment, overtreatment, guideline adherence, foreign body implantation, small bowel surgery, colorectal surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, central venous catheters
MeSH terms
Medical Overuse, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Adolescent, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Retrospective Studies, Surgical Wound Infection, United States, Databases, Factual, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Elective Surgical Procedures, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review