Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 956

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of material design and reactor engineering on TiO2 photocatalysis for CO2 reduction

Open access
Ola, Oluwafunmilola, Maroto-Valer, M.Mercedes·2015·Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews

Abstract

The continuous combustion of non-renewable fossil fuels and depletion of existing resources is intensifying the research and development of alternative future energy options that can directly abate and process ever-increasing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. Since CO 2 is a thermodynamically stable compound, its reduction must not consume additional energy or increase net CO 2 emissions. Renewable sources like solar energy provide readily available and continuous light supply required for driving this conversion process. Therefore, the use of solar energy to drive CO 2 photocatalytic reactions simultaneously addresses the aforementioned challenges, while producing sustainable fuels or chemicals suitable for use in existing energy infrastructure. Recent progress in this area has focused on the development and testing of promising TiO 2 based photocatalysts in different reactor configurations due to their unique physicochemical properties for CO 2 photoreduction. TiO 2 nanostructured materials with different morphological and textural properties modified by using organic and inorganic compounds as photosensitizers (dye sensitization), coupling semiconductors of different energy levels or doping with metals or non-metals have been tested. This review presents contemporary views on state of the art in photocatalytic CO 2 reduction over titanium oxide (TiO 2 ) nanostructured materials, with emphasis on material design and reactor configurations. In this review, we discuss existing and recent TiO 2 based supports, encompassing comparative analysis of existing systems, novel designs being employed to improve selectivity and photoconversion rates as well as emerging opportunities for future development, crucial to the field of CO 2 photocatalytic reduction. The influence of different operating and morphological variables on the selectivity and efficiency of CO 2 photoreduction is reviewed. Finally, perspectives on the progress of TiO 2 induced photocatalysis for CO 2 photoreduction will be presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2015.06.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 956

Metadata

Authors
Ola, O., & Maroto-Valer, M. M.
Venue
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
24
Pages
16-42
ISSN
1389-5567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W943078557
Cited by
956
References
7
FWCI
21.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of material design and reactor engineering on TiO2 photocatalysis for CO2 reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2015.06.001
The paper
Ola, O., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2015). Review of material design and reactor engineering on TiO2 photocatalysis for CO2 reduction. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2015.06.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.