Cited by 233Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Reaching beyond the classical receptive field of V1 neurons: horizontal or feedback axons?

Angelucci, Alessandra, Bullier, Jean·2003·Journal of Physiology-Paris

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that the orientation-selective surround field of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) is due to interactions provided solely by intrinsic long-range horizontal connections. We review evidence for and against this proposition and conclude that horizontal connections are too slow and cover too little visual field to subserve all the functions of suppressive surrounds of V1 neurons in the macaque monkey. We show that the extent of visual space covered by horizontal connections corresponds to the region of low contrast summation of the receptive field center mechanism. This region encompasses the classically defined receptive field center and the proximal surround. Beyond this region, feedback connections are the most likely substrate for surround suppression. We present evidence that inactivation of higher order areas leads to a major decrease in the strength of the suppressive surround of neurons in lower order areas, supporting the hypothesis that feedback connections play a major role in center-surround interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2003.09.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In comparison to bottom-up influences, the net effects of top-down connections on their targets are inhibitory.

    “There are several strands of empirical and theoretical evidence to suggest that, in comparison to bottom-up influences, the net effects of top-down connections on their targets are inhibitory”

    From Network discovery with DCM (2011) · cites this paper as Angelucci et al. 2003

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 106 · Cited by 233

Authors
Angelucci, A., & Bullier, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Angelucci, Alessandra
Venue
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
97
Issue
2-3
Pages
141-154
ISSN
0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131566261
Cited by
233
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY015262)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
primary visual cortex, receptive fields, surround suppression, horizontal connections, feedback connections, center-surround interactions, orientation selectivity, macaque
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Humans, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Feedback, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review