Reaching beyond the classical receptive field of V1 neurons: horizontal or feedback axons?
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that the orientation-selective surround field of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) is due to interactions provided solely by intrinsic long-range horizontal connections. We review evidence for and against this proposition and conclude that horizontal connections are too slow and cover too little visual field to subserve all the functions of suppressive surrounds of V1 neurons in the macaque monkey. We show that the extent of visual space covered by horizontal connections corresponds to the region of low contrast summation of the receptive field center mechanism. This region encompasses the classically defined receptive field center and the proximal surround. Beyond this region, feedback connections are the most likely substrate for surround suppression. We present evidence that inactivation of higher order areas leads to a major decrease in the strength of the suppressive surround of neurons in lower order areas, supporting the hypothesis that feedback connections play a major role in center-surround interactions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In comparison to bottom-up influences, the net effects of top-down connections on their targets are inhibitory.
“There are several strands of empirical and theoretical evidence to suggest that, in comparison to bottom-up influences, the net effects of top-down connections on their targets are inhibitory”
From Network discovery with DCM (2011) · cites this paper as Angelucci et al. 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 233
- Authors
- Angelucci, A., & Bullier, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Angelucci, Alessandra
- Venue
- Journal of Physiology-Paris
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 141-154
- ISSN
- 0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131566261
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01EY015262)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- primary visual cortex, receptive fields, surround suppression, horizontal connections, feedback connections, center-surround interactions, orientation selectivity, macaque
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Humans, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Feedback, Physiological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review