CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 230Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links.

Deneve, Sophie, Pouget, Alexandre·2004·Journal of Physiology-Paris
DOI 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Our perception of the word is the result of combining information between several senses, such as vision, audition and proprioception. These sensory modalities use widely different frames of reference to represent the properties and locations of object. Moreover, multisensory cues come with different degrees of reliability, and the reliability of a given cue can change in different contexts. The Bayesian framework--which we describe in this review--provides an optimal solution to deal with this issue of combining cues that are not equally reliable. However, this approach does not address the issue of frames of references. We show that this problem can be solved by creating cross-modal spatial links in basis function networks. Finally, we show how the basis function approach can be combined with the Bayesian framework to yield networks that can perform optimal multisensory combination. On the basis of this theory, we argue that multisensory integration is a dialogue between sensory modalities rather that the convergence of all sensory information onto a supra-modal area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 230

Related

Metadata

Authors
Deneve, S., & Pouget, A.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
ORCID
Pouget, Alexandre
Venue
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
98
Issue
1-3
Pages
249-258
ISSN
0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011
OpenAlex
W2013752524
Cited by
230
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
multisensory integration, Bayesian inference, cue reliability, word perception, speech perception, audiovisual integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Space Perception, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review