Cited by 111Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactEconomic Growth and ProductivityEconomic Theory and Policy

Savings and economic growth in South Africa: A multivariate causality test

Odhiambo, Nicholas M.·2009·Journal of Policy Modeling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.04.001

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odhiambo, N. M.
Affiliations
University of South Africa (ZA)
Corresponding author
Odhiambo, Nicholas M.
Venue
Journal of Policy Modeling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
708-718
ISSN
0161-8938 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018804362
Cited by
111
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Policy Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
Keywords
savings, economic growth, foreign capital inflows, South Africa, Granger causality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review