The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation analysis and modeling of reinforced catalyst coated membranes operated under OCV conditions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kundu et al. measured ψH2 ≈ 7.4 × 10−14 mol m−1 s−1 Pa−1 in a GORE PRIMEA series 5510 MEA.
“Kundu et al. measured ψH2 ≈ 7.4 × 10−14 mol m−1 s−1 Pa−1 in a GORE PRIMEA series 5510 MEA [166].”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [166]
Kundu et al. gave the variation in membrane thickness Lmem as dLmem/dt = −kdeg ψH2 pH2,ano with kdeg = 1.8 × 10−8 m2 mol−1 for a GORE PRIMEA series 5510 MEA.
“Hence, Kundu et al. gave the variation in membrane thickness Lmem as [166]:(126)dLmemdt=−kdegψH2pH2,ano with kdeg = 1.8 × 10−8 m2 mol−1 for a GORE PRIMEA series 5510 MEA.”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [166]
The F− byproduct of the degradation reaction is a common experimental tracer of degradation rate and as such can be applied to model validation.
“The F− byproduct of the degradation reaction is a common experimental tracer of degradation rate and as such can be applied to model validation [166].”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [166]
Citations
Cites
Morphological features (defects) in fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies
Kundu, S., Fowler, M. W., Simon, L. C., & Grot, S. (2006) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.027 · Cited by 244
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- LaConti, 2003, vol. 3, 647
- Mathias, 2005, Electrochem. Soc. Interface, 14, 24, 10.1149/2.F05053IF · DOI
- Guo, 2006, J. Power Sources, 160, 1269, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.093 · DOI
- Endoh, 2004, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 7, A209, 10.1149/1.1739314 · DOI
- St Pierre, 2000, J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst., 3, 99
- Collier, 2006, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31, 1838, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.05.006 · DOI
- Curtin, 2004, J. Power Sources, 131, 41, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.023 · DOI · Paper page
- Panchenko, 2004, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 2891, 10.1039/b404253k · DOI
- Healy, 2005, Fuel Cells, 5, 302, 10.1002/fuce.200400050 · DOI
- Aoki, 2006, Electrochem. Commun., 8, 1509, 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.07.017 · DOI
- Kadjo, 2006, Russ. J. Electrochem., 42, 467, 10.1134/S1023193506050041 · DOI
- Mittal, 2006, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, 1755, 10.1149/1.2219708 · DOI
- Rama, 2006, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A (J. Power Energy), 220, 535, 10.1243/09576509JPE212 · DOI
- Seddiq, 2006, J. Power Sources, 161, 371, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.04.074 · DOI
- Arato, 2006, J. Power Sources, 159, 861, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.093 · DOI
- Neyerlin, 2005, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, 1073, 10.1149/1.1897368 · DOI
- Inaba, 2006, Electrochim. Acta, 51, 5746, 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.008 · DOI
- Mittal, 2006, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 9, 299, 10.1149/1.2192696 · DOI
- Chen, 2007, ECS Trans., 11, 1127, 10.1149/1.2781025 · DOI
- Liu, 2006, ECS Trans., 3, 493, 10.1149/1.2356171 · DOI
- Ohma, 2006, ECS Trans., 3, 519, 10.1149/1.2356173 · DOI
- Ohma, 2007, J. Electrochem. Soc., 154, 757, 10.1149/1.2741129 · DOI
- Bi, 2007, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 10, B101, 10.1149/1.2712796 · DOI
- Endoh, 2008, ECS Trans., 1, 1083
- Fowler, 2002, J. Power Sources, 106, 274, 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01029-1 · DOI
- Teranishi, 2006, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 9, 475, 10.1149/1.2266163 · DOI
- Kundu, 2008, J. Power Sources, 182, 254, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.04.009 · DOI
- Cleghorn, 2003, vol. 3, 566
- Kocha, 2006, AIChE J., 52, 1916, 10.1002/aic.10780 · DOI
- Broka, 1997, J. Appl. Electrochem., 27, 117, 10.1023/A:1018469520562 · DOI
- Liu, 2001, J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst., 4, 227
- Unnikrishnan, 1997, J. Membr. Sci., 137, 133, 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00193-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickinson, E. J. F., & Smith, G. (2020) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes10110310 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Kundu, S., Fowler, M. W., Simon, L. C., Abouatallah, R., & Beydokhti, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Hydrogenics (Canada) (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fowler, Michael W.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 619-628
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082142688
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Keywords
- catalyst coated membranes, degradation modeling, open-circuit voltage, fluoride release, ionomer degradation, proton exchange membrane fuel cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
