The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen production by chemical-looping reforming in a circulating fluidized bed reactor using Ni-based oxygen carriers
Abstract
Abstract This work presents the experimental results obtained during auto-thermal chemical-looping reforming (CLR) in a 900 W th circulating fluidized bed reactor under continuous operation using methane as fuel. Two oxygen carriers based on NiO and supported on γ-Al 2 O 3 and α-Al 2 O 3 were used during more than 50 h of operation with each oxygen carrier. During operation the effect of different operating variables, like fuel reactor temperature, H 2 O/CH 4 molar ratio and solid circulation rate, on CH 4 conversion and gas product distribution was analyzed. It was found that in all operating conditions CH 4 conversion was very high (>98%) and the most important variable affecting to the gas product distribution was the solid circulation rate, that is, NiO/CH 4 molar ratio. Similar gas product distribution was obtained working with both oxygen carriers although at different NiO/CH 4 molar ratios. The oxygen carrier of NiO on α-Al 2 O 3 needed lower NiO/CH 4 molar ratio to reach the same gas product composition than the oxygen carrier of NiO on γ-Al 2 O 3 . Working at optimal operating conditions, 2.5 moles of H 2 per mol of CH 4 could be obtained in this process. During operation the oxygen carrier particles maintained their physical and chemical properties. These results suggest that these oxygen carriers could have a high durability, being suitable oxygen carriers for a CLR system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: the good, the bad and the future
Zhao, X., Zhou, H., Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Park, A.-H. A., Fennell, P. S., Shen, L., & Fan, L.-S. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee03718f · Cited by 558
Review of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology
Luo, M., Yi, Y., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Du, M., Pan, J., & Wang, Q. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.007 · Cited by 528
Hydrogen production from the thermochemical conversion of biomass: issues and challenges
Dou, B., Zhang, H., Song, Y., Zhao, L., Jiang, B., He, M., Ruan, C., Chen, H., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/c8se00535d · Cited by 323
Chemical Looping Combustion: Status and Development Challenges
Lyngfelt, A. (2020) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01454 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- de Diego, L. F., Ortiz, M., García-Labiano, F., Adánez, J., Abad, A., & Gayán, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004906379
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen production by chemical-looping reforming in a circulating fluidized bed reactor using Ni-based oxygen carriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.038
- The paper
- de Diego, L. F., Ortiz, M., García-Labiano, F., Adánez, J., Abad, A., & Gayán, P. (2009). Hydrogen production by chemical-looping reforming in a circulating fluidized bed reactor using Ni-based oxygen carriers. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.