The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical Looping Combustion: Status and Development Challenges
Abstract
Because the CO 2 capture is inherent in chemical looping combustion (CLC), thus ideally avoiding costly gas separation, this process has potential for uniquely low costs of CO 2 capture. The review reports on operational experiences with different oxygen carriers in CLC pilot operation. Further, the application to solid fuels is discussed in terms of technology challenges, routes for upscaling to commercial size, downstream gas treatment, options for achieving adequate circulation, and the use of biofuels in CLC to reach negative emissions. It is concluded that the necessary elements for a scale-up are at hand. Oxygen carrier materials of low cost have been tested in extended operation and found to have reasonable performance with respect to reactivity and lifetime. Designs for large-scale units have been performed, indicating that the process is technically realistic and should have a low cost of CO 2 capture. A scale-up strategy to minimize risk and costs has been suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
(2012) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504121211205250 · Cited by 4,477
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Self-citationProgress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies
Adanez, J., Abad, A., Garcia-Labiano, F., Gayan, P., & de Diego, L. F. (2012) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001 · Cited by 2,230
IPCC (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157940 · Cited by 1,482
Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review
Hossain, M. M., & de Lasa, H. I. (2008) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.028 · Cited by 961
Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels
Mattisson, T., Lyngfelt, A., & Leion, H. (2009) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.002 · Cited by 631
Self-citationChemical looping combustion of solid fuels
Adánez, J., Abad, A., Mendiara, T., Gayán, P., de Diego, L. F., & García-Labiano, F. (2018) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.005 · Cited by 612
Chemical Looping Systems for Fossil Energy Conversions
Fan, L. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470872888 · Cited by 544
Thermal Analysis of Chemical-Looping Combustion
Jerndal, E., Mattisson, T., & Lyngfelt, A. (2006) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1205/cherd05020 · Cited by 441
Self-citationAbanades, J. C., Arias, B., Lyngfelt, A., Mattisson, T., Wiley, D. E., Li, H., Ho, M. T., Mangano, E., & Brandani, S. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.018 · Cited by 441
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyngfelt, A.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-06-25
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 9077-9093
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W3037802995
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 137
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Looping Combustion: Status and Development Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01454
- The paper
- Lyngfelt, A. (2020). Chemical Looping Combustion: Status and Development Challenges. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
