Platinum catalyst degradation in phosphoric acid fuel cells for stationary applications
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using costly platinum as catalyst is main reason PAFCs are expensive.
“Also, using the costly platinum as a catalyst is the main reason that PAFCs are expensive.”
From Renewable energy harvesting with the application of nanotechnology: A review (2019) · cites this paper as [92]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Renewable energy harvesting with the application of nanotechnology: A review
Ahmadi, M. H., Ghazvini, M., Alhuyi Nazari, M., Ahmadi, M. A., Pourfayaz, F., Lorenzini, G., & Ming, T. (2019) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.4282 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aindow, T. T., Haug, A. T., & Jayne, D.
- Corresponding author
- Aindow, T.T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4506-4514
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972125526
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Connecticut
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Keywords
- platinum catalyst degradation, phosphoric acid fuel cells, stationary fuel cells, carbon support, electrochemically active surface area, temperature effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review