The influence of porous transport layer modifications on the water management in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During electrodischarge machining or laser perforation, the diffusion channels around the water channels gain hydrophilic pores due to degradation of the hydrophobic layer.
“It has been shown that during EDM or laser perforation, the diffusion channels around the water channels gain some hydrophilic pores due to the degradation of the hydrophobic layer.”
From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [158]
Electrodischarge machining or laser perforation improves the wettability of the gas diffusion layer and enhances liquid water removal, effectively improving water management performance.
“This strategy improves the wettability of the GDL while enhancing liquid water removal, effectively improving water management performance [150, 152, 158].”
From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [158]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly
Mo, S., Du, L., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., Wu, P., Meng, L., Wang, N., Xing, L., Zhao, M., et al. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00190-w · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“This strategy improves the wettability of the GDL while enhancing liquid water removal, effectively improving water management performance [150, 152, 158].”
Lee, J., Yip, R., Antonacci, P., Ge, N., Kotaka, T., Tabuchi, Y., & Bazylak, A. (2015) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0221507jes · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alink, R., Haußmann, J., Markötter, H., Schwager, M., Manke, I., & Gerteisen, D.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (DE)
- Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung Baden-Württemberg (DE)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Alink, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 233
- Pages
- 358-368
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128409427
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (03SF0360A)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Keywords
- proton exchange membrane fuel cells, porous transport layer, water management (fuel cells), microporous layer, laser perforation, machining, liquid water distribution, floods, humidification, oxygen diffusion, synchrotron radiography, cathode catalyst layer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
