The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calendar ageing analysis of a LiFePO4/graphite cell with dynamic model validations: Towards realistic lifetime predictions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the SOC dependence on calendar ageing lifetime is typically fitted by linear functions [100], exponential functions [99] or by the Tafel equation [95].”
From Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review (2019) · cites this paper as [99]
Citations
Cites
Phospho‐olivines as Positive‐Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Padhi, A. K., Nanjundaswamy, K. S., & Goodenough, J. B. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837571 · Cited by 7,935
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Electronically conductive phospho-olivines as lithium storage electrodes
Chung, S., Bloking, J. T., & Chiang, Y. (2002) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat732 · Cited by 2,964
Optimized LiFePO[sub 4] for Lithium Battery Cathodes
Yamada, A., Chung, S., & Hinokuma, K. (2001) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1348257 · Cited by 1,902
Cycle-life model for graphite-LiFePO4 cells
Wang, J. J., Liu, P., Hicks-Garner, J., Sherman, E., Soukiazian, S., Verbrugge, M. W., Tataria, H., Musser, J., & Finamore, P. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.134 · Cited by 1,785
A review on lithium-ion battery ageing mechanisms and estimations for automotive applications
Barré, A., Deguilhem, B., Grolleau, S., Gérard, M., Suard, F., & Riu, D. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 · Cited by 1,758
Approaching Theoretical Capacity of LiFePO[sub 4] at Room Temperature at High Rates
Huang, H., Yin, S. ‐., & Nazar, L. F. (2001) · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · doi:10.1149/1.1396695 · Cited by 1,415
Main aging mechanisms in Li ion batteries
Broussely, M., Biensan, P., Bonhomme, F., Blanchard, P., Herreyre, S., Nechev, K., & Staniewicz, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.172 · Cited by 1,162
Synthesize battery degradation modes via a diagnostic and prognostic model
Dubarry, M., Truchot, C., & Liaw, B. Y. (2012) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016 · Cited by 1,065
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Herb, 2009, vol. 57, 40
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hu, X., Xu, L., Lin, X., & Pecht, M. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.018 · Cited by 1,320
Lithium ion battery degradation: what you need to know
Edge, J. S., O’Kane, S. E. J., Prosser, R., Kirkaldy, N., Patel, A. N., Hales, A., Ghosh, A., Ai, W., Chen, J., Jiang, Y., et al. (2021) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d1cp00359c · Cited by 1,304
Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review
Li, Y., Liu, K., Foley, A. M., Zülke, A., Berecibar, M., Nanini-Maury, E., Van Mierlo, J., & Hoster, H. E. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109254 · Cited by 1,193
“In contrast, the SOC dependence on calendar ageing lifetime is typically fitted by linear functions [100], exponential functions [99] or by the Tafel equation [95].”
BackgroundHesse, H. C., Schimpe, M., Kucevic, D., & Jossen, A. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10122107 · Cited by 839
Random forest regression for online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries
Li, Y., Zou, C., Berecibar, M., Nanini-Maury, E., Chan, J. C.-W., van den Bossche, P., Van Mierlo, J., & Omar, N. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.182 · Cited by 727
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarasketa-Zabala, E., Gandiaga, I., Rodriguez-Martinez, L. M., & Villarreal, I.
- Affiliations
- Ikerlan (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Sarasketa-Zabala, E.
- ORCID
- Gandiaga, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 272
- Pages
- 45-57
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970117202
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- ETORTEK (IE12-335)
- Basque Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Keywords
- calendar aging, LiFePO4/graphite cells, dynamic model validation, solid electrolyte interphase growth, active lithium loss, storage temperature, state of charge, battery degradation modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
