CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of electrode thick spot irregularities on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell initial performance

Open access
Wang, Min, Rome, Grace, Medina, Samantha, Pfeilsticker, Jason R., Kang, Zhenye, Pylypenko, Svitlana, Ulsh, Michael, Bender, Guido·2020·Journal of Power Sources
DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228344
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228344

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Wee, 2007, Applications of proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 11, 1720, 10.1016/j.rser.2006.01.005 · DOI
  2. Wang, 2020, Boosting the oxygen reduction performance via tuning the synergy between metal core and oxide shell of Metal−Organic frameworks-derived Co@CoOx, ChemElectroChem, 7, 1590, 10.1002/celc.202000038 · DOI
  3. Wang, 2019, Engineering Fe–Fe3C@Fe–N–C active sites and hybrid structures from dual metal–organic frameworks for oxygen reduction reaction in H2–O2 fuel cell and Li–O2 battery, Adv. Funct. Mater., 29, 1901531, 10.1002/adfm.201901531 · DOI
  4. Thompson, 2018, Direct hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle cost analysis: system and high-volume manufacturing description, validation, and outlook, J. Power Sources, 399, 304, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.100 · DOI
  5. Sopian, 2006, Challenges and future developments in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Renew. Energy, 31, 719, 10.1016/j.renene.2005.09.003 · DOI
  6. Debe, 2012, Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells, Nature, 486, 43, 10.1038/nature11115 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mauger, 2018, Gravure coating for roll-to-roll manufacturing of proton-exchange-membrane fuel cell catalyst layers, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, F1012, 10.1149/2.0091813jes · DOI · Paper page
  8. Aieta, 2012, Applying infrared thermography as a quality-control tool for the rapid detection of polymer-electrolyte-membrane-fuel-cell catalyst-layer-thickness variations, J. Power Sources, 211, 4, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.030 · DOI
  9. V Zenyuk, 2016, Reactive impinging-flow technique for polymer-electrolyte-fuel-cell electrode-defect detection, J. Power Sources, 332, 372, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.109 · DOI
  10. Phillips, 2017, Utilizing a segmented fuel cell to study the effects of electrode coating irregularities on PEM fuel cell initial performance, Fuel Cell., 17, 288, 10.1002/fuce.201600214 · DOI
  11. Phillips, 2020, The effect of membrane casting irregularities on initial fuel cell performance, Fuel Cell., 20, 60, 10.1002/fuce.201900149 · DOI
  12. Castanheira, 2015, Carbon corrosion in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells: effect of the carbon structure, the degradation protocol, and the gas atmosphere, ACS Catal., 5, 2184, 10.1021/cs501973j · DOI
  13. Dubau, 2014, A review of PEM fuel cell durability: materials degradation, local heterogeneities of aging and possible mitigation strategies, WIREs Energy Environ, 3, 540, 10.1002/wene.113 · DOI
  14. Zhang, 2009, A review of platinum-based catalyst layer degradation in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 194, 588, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.073 · DOI
  15. Wu, 2008, A review of PEM fuel cell durability: degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies, J. Power Sources, 184, 104, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Borup, 2007, Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation, Chem. Rev., 107, 3904, 10.1021/cr050182l · DOI
  17. Phillips, 2018, Impacts of electrode coating irregularities on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell lifetime using quasi in-situ infrared thermography and accelerated stress testing, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 6390, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.050 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gutoff, 2006, Coating and Drying Defects, 10.1002/0470044136 · DOI
  19. Osmieri, 2020, Use of a segmented cell for the combinatorial development of platinum group metal-free electrodes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 452, 227829, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227829 · DOI
  20. Wang, 2019, Effective electrode edge protection for proton exchange membrane fuel cell drive cycle operation, ECS Trans, 92, 351, 10.1149/09208.0351ecst · DOI
  21. Kabir, 2019, Elucidating the dynamic nature of fuel cell electrodes as a function of conditioning: an ex situ material characterization and in situ electrochemical diagnostic study, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 45016, 10.1021/acsami.9b11365 · DOI
  22. Stevens, 2003, Electrochemical characterization of the active surface in carbon-supported platinum electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cells, J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, A770, 10.1149/1.1573195 · DOI
  23. Kumano, 2019, Controlling cracking formation in fuel cell catalyst layers, J. Power Sources, 419, 219, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.058 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Li, 2018, Preventing the coffee-ring effect and aggregate sedimentation by in situ gelation of monodisperse materials, Chem. Sci., 9, 7596, 10.1039/C8SC03302A · DOI
  25. Mampallil, 2018, A review on suppression and utilization of the coffee-ring effect, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 252, 38, 10.1016/j.cis.2017.12.008 · DOI
  26. Shinozaki, 2015, Oxygen reduction reaction measurements on platinum electrocatalysts utilizing rotating disk electrode technique, J. Electrochem. Soc., 162, F1384, 10.1149/2.0551512jes · DOI
  27. Garsany, 2011, Impact of film drying procedures on RDE characterization of Pt/VC electrocatalysts, J. Electroanal. Chem., 662, 396, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.016 · DOI
  28. Kocha, 2017, Best practices and testing protocols for benchmarking ORR activities of fuel cell electrocatalysts using rotating disk electrode, Electrocatalysis, 8, 366, 10.1007/s12678-017-0378-6 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2007, In situ characterization of the catalyst layer in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell, J. Electrochem. Soc., 154, B1152, 10.1149/1.2777987 · DOI
  30. Sassin, 2019, Understanding the interplay between cathode catalyst layer porosity and thickness on transport limitations en route to high-performance PEMFCs, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 16944, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.194 · DOI
  31. Zhou, 2007, Numerical study on the compression effect of gas diffusion layer on PEMFC performance, J. Power Sources, 170, 93, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.073 · DOI
  32. Zhou, 2007, Influence of clamping force on the performance of PEMFCs, J. Power Sources, 163, 874, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.068 · DOI
  33. O'Hayre, 2016, Fuel Cell Fundamentals, 10.1002/9781119191766 · DOI
  34. Millichamp, 2015, Mechanisms and effects of mechanical compression and dimensional change in polymer electrolyte fuel cells – a review, J. Power Sources, 284, 305, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.111 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Rome, G., Medina, S., Pfeilsticker, J. R., Kang, Z., Pylypenko, S., Ulsh, M., & Bender, G.
Affiliations
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
Corresponding author
Bender, Guido
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
466
Pages
228344
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228344
OpenAlex
W3028038404
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Power Sources (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, membrane electrode assembly, mass transfer, electrochemically active surface area, mass activity, fuel cell degradation, manufacturing tolerances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review