The DOI matches its Crossref record; 312 of the 312 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Lithium-ion batteries are the state-of-the-art electrochemical energy storage technology for mobile electronic devices and electric vehicles. Accordingly, they have attracted a continuously increasing interest in academia and industry, which has led to a steady improvement in energy and power density, while the costs have decreased at even faster pace. Important questions, though, are, to which extent and how (fast) the performance can be further improved, and how the envisioned goal of truly sustainable energy storage can be realized. Herein, we combine a comprehensive review of important findings and developments in this field that have enabled their tremendous success with an overview of very recent trends concerning the active materials for the negative and positive electrode as well as the electrolyte. Moreover, we critically discuss current and anticipated electrode fabrication processes, as well as an essential prerequisite for “greener” batteries – the recycling. In each of these chapters, we eventually summarize important remaining challenges and propose potential directions for further improvement. Finally, we conclude this article with a brief summary of the performance metrics of commercial lithium-ion cells and a few thoughts towards the future development of this technology including several key performance indicators for the mid-term to long-term future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Dash, R. K., & Pannala, S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27449 · Cited by 108
RetractedArmand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Self-citationElectrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices
Dunn, B., Kamath, H., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212741 · Cited by 15,072
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Phospho‐olivines as Positive‐Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Padhi, A. K., Nanjundaswamy, K. S., & Goodenough, J. B. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837571 · Cited by 7,933
Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
Xu, K. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030203g · Cited by 7,437
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries
Yabuuchi, N., Kubota, K., Dahbi, M., & Komaba, S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500192f · Cited by 6,478
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Sodium-ion batteries: present and future
Hwang, J.-Y., Myung, S.-T., & Sun, Y.-K. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00776g · Cited by 5,305
Cited by
Li, J., Fleetwood, J., Hawley, W. B., & Kays, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00565 · Cited by 895
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling─Overview of Techniques and Trends
Baum, Z. J., Bird, R. E., Yu, X., & Ma, J. (2022) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02602 · Cited by 747
Martins, L. S., Guimarães, L. F., Botelho Junior, A. B., Tenório, J. A. S., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113091 · Cited by 361
Strategies towards enabling lithium metal in batteries: interphases and electrodes
Horstmann, B., Shi, J., Amine, R., Werres, M., He, X., Jia, H., Hausen, F., Cekic-Laskovic, I., Wiemers-Meyer, S., Lopez, J., et al. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00767j · Cited by 298
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Armand, M., Axmann, P., Bresser, D., Copley, M., Edström, K., Ekberg, C., Guyomard, D., Lestriez, B., Novák, P., Petranikova, M., Porcher, W., Trabesinger, S., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., & Zhang, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 479
- Pages
- 228708
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3086341487
- Cited by
- 888
- References
- 312
- FWCI
- 32.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708
- The paper
- Armand, M., Axmann, P., Bresser, D., Copley, M., Edström, K., Ekberg, C., Guyomard, D., Lestriez, B., Novák, P., Petranikova, M., Porcher, W., Trabesinger, S., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., & Zhang, H. (2020). Lithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.