Cited by 43Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Dual-layer catalyst layers for increased proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance

Open access
Garsany, Yannick, Atkinson, Robert W., Gould, Benjamin D., Martin, Rachel, Dubau, Laetitia, Chatenet, Marian, Swider-Lyons, Karen E.·2021·Journal of Power Sources

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230574

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nitrogen-sorption porosimetry is widely used for studying the morphology of micropores.

    “Nitrogen-sorption porosimetry is also widely used for studying the morphology of micropores [220].”
  • The Nafion content in the PEM/CL interface is optimal for proton transportation yet is too high in the CL/GDL interface and leads to flooding and increased gas diffusion resistance.

    “For example, the Nafion content in the PEM/CL interface is optimal for proton transportation yet is too high in the CL/GDL interface and leads to flooding and increased gas diffusion resistance [220].”
  • The position of Pt/VC or Pt/KB had no major impact on cell performance.

    “Surprisingly, the position of Pt/VC or Pt/KB had no major impact on cell performance [220].”
  • Different catalyst supports, including a high microporosity carbon (Ketjen Black EC-300J) and a low porosity carbon (XC-72 Vulcan carbon), were applied to build a dual-layer catalyst layer.

    “As shown in Fig. 26a-c, different catalyst supports, including a high microporosity carbon (Ketjen Black EC-300J) and a low porosity carbon (XC-72 Vulcan carbon), were applied to build a dual-layer catalyst layer.”
  • The dual-layer design remarkably improved the fuel cell performance compared to the one using mixed catalysts.

    “The dual-layer design remarkably improved the fuel cell performance compared to the one using mixed catalysts.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garsany, Y., Atkinson, R. W., Gould, B. D., Martin, R., Dubau, L., Chatenet, M., & Swider-Lyons, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Excet (United States) (US)
  • United States Naval Research Laboratory (US)
  • Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
Corresponding author
Garsany, Yannick
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
514
Pages
230574
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202313842
Cited by
43
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Power Sources (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, cathode catalyst layer, carbon-supported platinum, Vulcan XC-72, gas diffusion media, water management (fuel cells), membrane hydration, relative humidity, fuel cell performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review