In-depth analysis of the human tear proteome
Abstract
The tears, a critical body fluid of the surface of the eye, contain an unknown number of molecules including proteins/peptides, lipids, small molecule metabolites, and electrolytes. There have been continued efforts for exploring the human tear proteome to develop biomarkers of disease. In this study, we used the high speed TripleTOF 5600 system as the platform to analyze the human tear proteome from healthy subjects (3 females and 1 male, average age: 36±14). We have identified 1543 proteins in the tears with less than 1% false discovery rate, which represents the largest number of human tear proteins reported to date. The data set was analyzed for gene ontology (GO) and compared with the human plasma proteome, NEIBank lacrimal gland gene dataset and NEIBank cornea gene dataset. This comprehensive tear protein list may serve as a reference list of human tear proteome for biomarker research of ocular diseases or establishment of MRM (Multiple Reaction Monitoring) assays for targeted analysis. Tear fluid is a useful and an accessible source not only for evaluating ocular surface tissues (cornea and conjunctiva), inflammation, lacrimal gland function and a number of disease conditions, such as dry eye as well as response to treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tear fluid contains thousands of proteins-the most abundant of which are lysozyme, lactoferrin and albumin.
“As tear fluid contains thousands of proteins—the most abundant of which are lysozyme, lactoferrin and albumin—non-invasive tear monitoring could also be used to detect protein biomarkers correlated with disease121.”
From Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring (2019) · cites this paper as [121]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 379
- Authors
- Zhou, L., Zhao, S. Z., Koh, S. K., Chen, L., Vaz, C., Tanavde, V., Li, X. R., & Beuerman, R. W.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Tianjin Medical University (CN)
- Singapore Eye Research Institute (SG)
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Lei
- Venue
- Journal of Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3877-3885
- ISSN
- 1874-3919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034248704
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Proteomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- tear proteins, ocular surface, dry eye, lacrimal gland, cornea, conjunctiva, ocular inflammation, multiple reaction monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Eye Proteins, Female, Humans, Lacrimal Apparatus, Male, Middle Aged, Tears, Proteome, Databases, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review