Cited by 198Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dialectical behavior therapy alters emotion regulation and amygdala activity in patients with borderline personality disorder

Open access
Goodman, Marianne, Carpenter, David, Tang, Cheuk Y., Goldstein, Kim E., Avedon, Jennifer, Fernandez, Nicolas, Mascitelli, Kathryn A., Blair, Nicholas J. +4 more·2014·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objective Siever and Davis' (1991) psychobiological framework of borderline personality disorder (BPD) identifies affective instability (AI) as a core dimension characterized by prolonged and intense emotional reactivity. Recently, deficient amygdala habituation, defined as a change in response to repeated relative to novel unpleasant pictures within a session, has emerged as a biological correlate of AI in BPD. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), an evidence-based treatment, targets AI by teaching emotion-regulation skills. This study tested the hypothesis that BPD patients would exhibit decreased amygdala activation and improved habituation, as well as improved emotion regulation with standard 12-month DBT.Methods Event-related fMRI was obtained pre- and post-12-months of standard-DBT in unmedicated BPD patients. Healthy controls (HCs) were studied as a benchmark for normal amygdala activity and change over time (n = 11 per diagnostic-group). During each scan, participants viewed an intermixed series of unpleasant, neutral and pleasant pictures presented twice (novel, repeat). Change in emotion regulation was measured with the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation (DERS) scale.Results fMRI results showed the predicted Group × Time interaction: compared with HCs, BPD patients exhibited decreased amygdala activation with treatment. This post-treatment amygdala reduction in BPD was observed for all three pictures types, but particularly marked in the left hemisphere and during repeated-emotional pictures. Emotion regulation measured with the DERS significantly improved with DBT in BPD patients. Improved amygdala habituation to repeated-unpleasant pictures in patients was associated with improved overall emotional regulation measured by the DERS (total score and emotion regulation strategy use subscale).Conclusion These findings have promising treatment implications and support the notion that DBT targets amygdala hyperactivity-part of the disturbed neural circuitry underlying emotional dysregulation in BPD. Future work includes examining how DBT-induced amygdala changes interact with frontal-lobe regions implicated in emotion regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.06.020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dialectical behavior therapy prevents suicidal behavior without proven antidepressant benefit, indicating it works via problem-solving and stress management or diathesis elements such as dampening amygdala reactivity to negative emotions.

    “Dialectical behavior therapy prevents suicidal behavior without proven antidepressant benefit, indicating that it works via problem-solving and stress management or elements of the diathesis such as dampening amygdala reactivity to negative emotions (235).”

    From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [235]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 198

Authors
Goodman, M., Carpenter, D., Tang, C. Y., Goldstein, K. E., Avedon, J., Fernandez, N., Mascitelli, K. A., Blair, N. J., New, A. S., Triebwasser, J., Siever, L. J., & Hazlett, E. A.
Affiliations
  • New York/New Jersey VA Health Care Network (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Marianne
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
57
Pages
108-116
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053803851
Cited by
198
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1
FWCI
20.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
DBT
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, amygdala activity, emotion regulation, neuroticism, emotional reactivity, amygdala hyperactivity, emotional dysregulation, treatment response, event-related fMRI
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review