Cited by 44Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesSleep and related disorders

Effects of prolonged exposure and virtual reality exposure on suicidal ideation in active duty soldiers: An examination of potential mechanisms

Norr, Aaron M., Smolenski, Derek J., Reger, Greg M.·2018·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objective The current study sought to investigate the effects of exposure therapy on suicidal ideation (SI), as well as potential mechanistic pathways of SI reduction among active duty military personnel. Methods Active duty army soldiers (N = 162) were recruited from a military base in the U.S. and were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing Prolonged Exposure (PE), Virtual Reality Exposure (VRE), and a wait-list control for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) stemming from deployments to Iraq or Afghanistan. PTSD diagnosis followed DSM-IV-TR criteria. Outcome measures were assessed via self-report and clinician interview. PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, and SI were included in an autoregressive cross-lagged panel model to examine mechanistic pathways. Results Analyses revealed that PE/VRE had a lower probability of post-treatment suicidal ideation (OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.06, 0.86]) compared to the waitlist control. Mediation analyses revealed a significant indirect effect from treatment condition to post-treatment PTSD symptoms through mid-treatment SI (Estimate = -1.420, 95% CI -3.559, -0.223]). Baseline suicidal ideation did not interact with treatment condition to predict PTSD symptom change at mid-treatment (p = .231) or post-treatment (p = .672). Conclusion PE/VRE successfully reduced SI, and the presence of SI at baseline did not affect PTSD symptom reduction, promoting the utility of using PE/VRE to address suicidality among individuals…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.009

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norr, A. M., Smolenski, D. J., & Reger, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Defense Health Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Reger, Greg M.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
103
Pages
69-74
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801442530
Cited by
44
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Military Operational Medicine Research Program
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Office
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Northwest Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
suicidal ideation, prolonged exposure therapy, virtual reality exposure therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, active duty military personnel, military personnel, Iraq and Afghanistan deployment, depressive symptoms, PTSD symptom reduction, suicidality
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Military Personnel, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Treatment Outcome, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review