Cited by 291Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Does Suicidal Ideation as Measured by the PHQ-9 Predict Suicide Among VA Patients?

Louzon, Samantha A., Bossarte, Robert, McCarthy, John F., Katz, Ira R.·2016·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Frequency of suicidal ideation in the past two weeks, assessed by item 9 of the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), has been positively associated with suicide mortality among patients in a setting other than the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). To inform suicide prevention activities at the VHA, it is important to evaluate whether item 9 is associated with suicide risk among patients in the VHA system. METHODS: PHQ-9 assessments (N=447,245) conducted by the VHA between October 1, 2009, and September 30, 2010, were collected. National Death Index data were used to ascertain suicide mortality from the date of PHQ-9 assessment through September 30, 2011. Multivariable proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate associations between responses to item 9 and suicide mortality. RESULTS: After the analyses adjusted for covariates, a response of "several days" for item 9 was associated with a 75% increased risk of suicide (hazard ratio [HR]=1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.24-2.46), a response of "more than half the days" was associated with a 115% increased risk of suicide (HR=2.15, CI=1.32-3.51), and a response of "nearly every day" was associated with a 185% increased risk of suicide (HR=2.85, CI=1.81-4.47), compared with a response of "not at all." However, 71.6% of suicides during the study period occurred among patients who responded "not at all" to item 9 from their most recent PHQ-9. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of suicidal ideation, indicated by item 9 of the PHQ-9, were associated with increased risk of suicide among patients in the VHA system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201500149

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Louzon, S. A., Bossarte, R., McCarthy, J. F., & Katz, I. R.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2016-05-01
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
517-522
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2239385095
Cited by
291
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
29.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicidal ideation, PHQ-9, suicide mortality, suicide risk, veterans, suicide prevention, Patient Health Questionnaire, suicide risk screening, Veterans Health Administration
MeSH terms
Patient Health Questionnaire, Suicide Prevention, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Suicide, United States, Veterans, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review