Cited by 59Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsTemporomandibular Joint DisordersFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Alexithymia and pain in temporomandibular disorder

Glaros, Alan G., Lumley, Mark A.·2005·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective To clarify the relationship of global alexithymia and its facets with pain, assessed prospectively using experience sampling methods (ESMs), in temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Methods People with painful TMD (n=49), pain-free somatic controls (24 people with disk displacement), and healthy controls (n = 28) completed measures of alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 [TAS-20]) and depressed mood. Patients with painful TMD used ESM to record jaw pain multiple times daily for a week. Results The somatic and the healthy controls were equivalent on alexithymia and were combined. The painful TMD group had higher difficulty in identifying feelings but lower externally oriented thinking (EOT); only the latter effect remained after covarying depressed mood. Among patients with painful TMD, the TAS-20 total and EOT correlated positively with pain severity after controlling for depressed mood. Conclusion Findings highlight the complex relationships of alexithymia and its facets to TMD pain. Research should examine alexithymia facets separately and distinguish between methods that compare groups on alexithymia (e.g., pain patients versus controls) and those that correlate alexithymia with pain severity within a group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.05.007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pain sensitivity in individuals with chronic pain conditions has been associated with alexithymia.

    “While pain sensitivity in individuals with chronic pain conditions has been associated with alexithymia (Glaros and Lumley, 2005; Lumley et al., 2002), little research has investigated the relationship between pain hyper- and hypo-sensitivity and other interoceptive difficulties in these clinical groups.”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Glaros and Lumley, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glaros, A. G., & Lumley, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Kansas City University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Glaros, Alan G.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
85-88
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064727882
Cited by
59
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE13563, R01DE013563)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
alexithymia, temporomandibular disorders, jaw pain, pain intensity, Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, externally oriented thinking, depressive mood, ecological momentary assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Sampling Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review