Cited by 62Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsCancer survivorship and careMedicine, History, and Philosophy

Alexithymia and cancer pain: the effect of psychological intervention

Tulipani, Cinzia, Morelli, Francesco, Spedicato, Maria Rosaria, Maiello, Evaristo, Todarello, Orlando, Porcelli, Piero·2010·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alexithymia is likely to be involved in the pain experience of cancer patients, but the extent to which psychological interventions may modify both pain and alexithymia is unclear. METHODS: A group of 52 consecutive cancer patients were enrolled in a 6-month multicomponent psychological intervention trial, and compared to 52 control patients who received standard medical care. Validated scales for pain, alexithymia, coping with disease, illness behavior, psychological distress, and psychosocial functioning were administered at baseline and 6 months later. RESULTS: Pain was strongly associated with alexithymia and several psychological dimensions. Although at baseline patients in the intervention group had worse psychological and somatic health, at follow-up their level of pain intensity, alexithymia, and somatic concerns had significantly improved compared to control patients. Patients in the intervention group showed dramatic improvements in pain perception, alexithymia, and other psychological variables, while control patients showed an unexpected significant worsening of alexithymia, depression, and adjustment to disease. Multiple regression showed that psychological intervention and alexithymia were both independently associated with the reduction in pain perception. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the close association between alexithymia and pain, and show that multicomponent psychological intervention may significantly reduce both alexithymia and cancer pain. Although the present findings need replication, they should strongly encourage clinicians to provide patients with psychological interventions targeting alexithymic difficulties and helping patients to cope better with both feelings and somatic perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000286960

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tulipani, C., Morelli, F., Spedicato, M. R., Maiello, E., Todarello, O., & Porcelli, P.
Affiliations
  • Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Gastroenterology Hospital "Saverio de Bellis" (IT)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
156-163
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2034411578
Cited by
61
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
alexithymia, cancer pain, psychological intervention, multicomponent intervention, pain perception, coping with illness, psychological distress, depression, adaptation to illness, somatic symptoms, psychosocial functioning
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Referral and Consultation, Social Adjustment, Illness Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review