Cited by 282Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseCancer survivorship and careGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Psychological distress and cancer mortality

Hamer, Mark, Chida, Yoichi, Molloy, Gerard J.·2009·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Background Psychological distress, such as ongoing depression and anxiety-related symptomatology, has been associated with a higher risk of incident cancer and poorer survival, although previous studies have not compared prognostic and etiological effects within the same sample. We examined the association between psychological distress and cancer mortality in a sample comprising participants with and without previous cancer admissions. Methods Data were collected from a community-based sample of 15,453 men and women (including 295 people with cancer history) and prospectively linked to a patient-based database of cancer registry and deaths during an average follow-up of 7.0+/-3.3 years. Psychological distress was assessed using the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Results There were 425 incident cancer deaths. Psychological distress (GHQ-12 > or =4) was associated with increased cancer mortality in participants with cancer history [age, gender, social status, marital status, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, and physical activity; adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=1.97; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.05-3.71; P=.035], but not in participants without cancer history. Among participants without cancer history, there was, however, an association between distress and lung cancer death (age- and gender-adjusted HR=2.04; 95% CI=1.36-3.06; P=.001), although adjustment for covariates attenuated this association. Conclusions Psychological distress was a pred…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.11.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 282

Authors
Hamer, M., Chida, Y., & Molloy, G. J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hamer, Mark
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
255-258
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162062703
Cited by
282
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
psychological distress, cancer mortality, depression, anxiety, lung cancer, cancer survivors, incident cancer, prognostic factors, etiological factors, General Health Questionnaire, community-based cohort
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety, Cause of Death, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Risk Factors, Scotland, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review