Nonpharmacologic interventions for managing distress, anxiety, and depression for patients with cancer and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
As more cancer treatments take place in outpatient settings, family caregivers provide essential care and emotional support over long periods. Unaddressed patient and caregiver psychological distress can lead to worse outcomes, reflecting the challenges of managing complex care demands in the home setting. This systematic review and meta‐analysis examined how well nonpharmacologic interventions (NPIs) reduce distress, anxiety, and depression in adult patients with solid tumors and their family caregivers. The authors included 68 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 11,987 participants. NPIs were characterized as psychoeducation, therapeutic counseling, skills training, or behavior modification. By using random‐effects models (Hedges g), they observed that NPIs significantly reduced patient distress at both 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.13) and 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.18), but NPIs did not significantly reduce caregiver distress. In the short term (0.0–3.0 months), NPIs also significantly reduced anxiety (g = 0.31 for patients; g = 0.15 for caregivers) and depression (g = 0.28 for patients; g = 0.25 for caregivers). Subgroup analyses examined the impact of patient and caregiver characteristics along with NPI type, delivery format, dose, and duration. NPIs delivered jointly to patients and caregivers yielded significant effects that were higher compared with NPIs delivered separately. NPIs can help manage distress in patients and reduce anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers. However, the lack of long‐term follow‐up limits our understanding of their impact on patients and caregivers with prolonged or delayed psychological symptoms (PROSPERO registration number CRD42024536629).
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 68 RCTs with 11,987 participants found that nonpharmacologic interventions significantly reduced patient distress in the short and intermediate term and short-term anxiety/depression in patients and caregivers, but effects generally did not persist beyond 3 months except for patient distress and caregiver depression up to 3.1–6.0 months. Caregiver distress did not significantly improve at any time point.
Key findings
- Among 68 RCTs and 11,987 participants, NPIs significantly reduced patient distress at 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03–0.23; p = .008) and 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02–0.34; p = .027), but not beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.05; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.18; p = .520). Caregiver distress was not significantly reduced at 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.05; p = .581), 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.22; p = .198), or >6.0 months (g = 0.22; p = .140).
- In the short term (0.0–3.0 months), NPIs significantly reduced patient anxiety (g = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16–0.46; p = .000), caregiver anxiety (g = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02–0.28; p = .023), patient depression (g = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17–0.40; p = .000), and caregiver depression (g = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11–0.38; p = .000).
- Caregiver depression remained significant at 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.01–0.43; p = .037) but not beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.25; 95% CI, −0.04 to 0.54; p = .095); patient anxiety and depression were not significant after 3 months.
- Subgroup analyses found therapeutic counseling was associated with significant reductions in patient and caregiver anxiety and depression; dyad-together delivery significantly reduced patient distress and anxiety/depression in both groups; mixed face-to-face/remote formats significantly reduced patient distress, anxiety, and depression; higher attrition was associated with smaller effects for patient and caregiver anxiety and caregiver depression.
Methods
- Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted per PRISMA 2020, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024536629); databases searched included Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP through January 27, 2025 (CINAHL through December 11, 2023).
- Included 68 RCTs (70 reports) of adult patients with solid tumors and their adult family caregivers; excluded children with cancer and patients with hematologic malignancies. NPIs were categorized as psychoeducation (k = 9), therapeutic counseling (k = 33), skills training (k = 20), or behavior modification (k = 6).
- Outcomes were grouped at 0.0–3.0, 3.1–6.0, and >6.0 months; random-effects models used Hedges g; heterogeneity assessed with Cochran Q; subgroup and meta-regression analyses examined moderators; sensitivity used leave-one-study-out; publication bias assessed with Egger t-test; GRADE assessed certainty. The 68 RCTs included 5,795 patients and 6,192 caregivers; median NPI dose was 6.0 hours, 6.0 sessions, and 6.0 weeks.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: risk of bias was assessed only for primary outcomes of each RCT; 12 studies were excluded because of incomplete or incompatible data; excluded caregivers were younger but represented a smaller sample (1,443 vs. 6,192 included); certainty of evidence was moderate for short-term outcomes and low to very low for longer-term outcomes; generalizability was limited by concentration in high-income countries, predominantly female and Caucasian samples, and poor race/ethnicity reporting outside the United States; patients with hematologic malignancies and dyads in which both members were willing and able to participate were excluded; pharmacologic treatments were addressed in only two RCTs; bereavement-related outcomes were outside scope; and heterogeneity across studies limits precision of pooled estimates.
- Evident from the text: long-term follow-up was limited, with most RCTs assessing outcomes within the first 3 months (n = 59) versus intermediate (n = 22) and long-term (n = 14) outcomes; the median contact time of approximately 6 hours may explain short-term benefits and limited durability; and 27 RCTs (39.7%) did not report disease stage, limiting interpretation by cancer stage.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
25 of 49 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Twelve studies lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs and were included only in the narrative synthesis.
“Twelve studies (13 reports because of one pair of publications from the same RCT 42 , 43 ) lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs (e.g., re‐randomization, multiple overlapping intervention arms) and were included only in the narrative synthesis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Baucom DH, et al. Partner‐assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2009; 115(18 suppl): 4326‐ 4338. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24578 19731357 PMC2762322 source
The Method > Data Analyses section describes this paper’s randomized trial and its analysis of 130 couples, not a synthesis of multiple studies. I searched for the twelve-study count, insufficient data, incompatible designs, and narrative synthesis; our copy does not address which studies a later review included only in its narrative synthesis. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [43] Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Baucom DH, et al. Partner‐assisted emotional disclosure for patients with GI cancer: 8‐week follow‐up and processes associated with change. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20(8): 1755‐ 1762. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1272-z 21947440 source
- Premisecitation
Prolonged and unmanaged psychological and physical burden may lead to psychological distress and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression that often co-occur with a cancer diagnosis.
“Prolonged and unmanaged psychological and physical burden may lead to psychological distress 9 , 10 and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression 11 that often co‐occur with a cancer diagnosis. 12 , 13 , 14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Dhumal T, Siddiqui ZA, Kelley GA, Harper F, Kelly KM. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of interventions addressing caregiver distress and burden among cancer caregivers. PEC Innov. 2023; 2: 100145. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100145 37214528 PMC10194362 source
The Introduction links the burden of caring for someone with cancer to physical and psychological distress and says informal caregivers may experience anxiety and depressive symptoms. It does not specify that the burden is prolonged or unmanaged, or establish how often those symptoms co-occur with a cancer diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [10] Hamer M, Chida Y, Molloy GJ. Psychological distress and cancer mortality. J Psychosom Res. 2009; 66(3): 255‐ 258. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.11.002 19232239 source
- cites [11] Ross CE. Social Causes of Psychological Distress. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2003.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Nonpharmacologic interventions have been tested for distress, anxiety, and depression in patients with cancer and their caregivers.
“Nonpharmacologic interventions (NPIs) have been tested for distress, anxiety, and depression in patients with cancer and their caregivers. 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Dhumal T, Siddiqui ZA, Kelley GA, Harper F, Kelly KM. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of interventions addressing caregiver distress and burden among cancer caregivers. PEC Innov. 2023; 2: 100145. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100145 37214528 PMC10194362 source
The Results, Intervention characteristics section (page not provided) describes nonpharmacologic interventions tested for caregiver distress, anxiety, and depression. The paper discusses patient–caregiver interventions, but the cited passages do not establish that those interventions were tested for all three outcomes in patients with cancer as well as their caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW. Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta‐analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60(5): 317‐ 339. doi: 10.3322/caac.20081 20709946 PMC2946584 source
- cites [20] Ferrell B, Wittenberg E. A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67(4): 318‐ 325. doi: 10.3322/caac.21396 28319263 source
- Interpretationcitation
Hybrid approaches may combine the benefits of in-person therapeutic engagement with delivery flexibility.
“Hybrid approaches may combine the benefits of in‐person therapeutic engagement with delivery flexibility. 117 , 123”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [117] Kim M, Tan KR, Coombs LA. Efficacy of web‐based interventions on depression and anxiety in cancer caregivers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Psychooncology. 2024; 33(7): e9301. doi: 10.1002/pon.9301 39039753 source
- cites [123] Lei F, Lee E, Shin J, Lee S‐Y. Non‐pharmacological interventions on anxiety and depression in lung cancer patients’ informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2023; 18(3): e0282887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282887 36913399 PMC10010534 source
The Results (Effect by mode of contact) and Discussion report that in-person and telephone-based interventions each reduced anxiety and depression among informal caregivers of lung cancer patients. The review assessed those delivery modes separately; it does not report that a hybrid approach combines therapeutic engagement with delivery flexibility. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
NPIs designed for both patients and caregivers often focus primarily on patients' needs, whereas caregivers receive less attention.
“NPIs designed for both patients and caregivers often focus primarily on patients' needs, whereas caregivers receive less attention. 25”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Chow R, Mathews JJ, Cheng EY, et al. Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta‐analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023; 115(8): 896‐ 908. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad075 37279594 PMC10407714 source
The introductory passage (indexed under Abstract > Conclusions; page unavailable) says that patient-centered care has led to unintended neglect of caregivers. The Methods distinguish interventions for patient–caregiver dyads from those directed at patients, but the paper does not say that interventions designed for both typically prioritize patients’ needs. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
There is interdependence between patient and caregiver distress.
“We focused on NPIs that targeted both patients and caregivers, reflecting the growing body of literature regarding interdependence between patient and caregiver distress. 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 141”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [110] Ellis KR, Oh S, Hecht HK, Northouse L. Symptom distress and quality of life among Black Americans with cancer and their family caregivers. Psychooncology. 2021; 30(8): 1356‐ 1365. doi: 10.1002/pon.5691 33861891 PMC8672379 source
The Results (Symptom Distress → QOL, Partner Effects; page unavailable) report that distress in one member of a Black American patient–caregiver dyad was associated with the other member’s quality of life. The Discussion calls this interdependence in their wellbeing, but the reported partner effects do not establish a direct association between patient distress and caregiver distress. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [111] Jin Y, Li X, Ma H, Xiong L, Zhao M, Wang H. Dyadic effects of perceived stress, relationship satisfaction and distress disclosure on emotional distress in colorectal cancer patients and their family caregivers: an actor‐partner interdependence mediation model. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024; 11(10): 100580. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100580 39351017 PMC11440261 source
- cites [112] Taurisano P, De Feudis RL, Graziano G, et al. Patient‐caregiver relationship in cancer fatigue and distress. A dyadic approach. Curr Psychol. 2023; 42(32): 28167‐ 28179. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03860-y source
- Premisecitation
Caregivers have a central role in cancer care, especially in low-resource settings in the United States and parts of Europe and in low-income to middle-income countries.
“Given the growing evidence regarding the interdependence of patient and caregiver well‐being 110 , 111 , 112 and caregivers' central role in cancer care, especially in low‐resource settings in the United States and parts of Europe and in low‐income to middle‐income countries, 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [127] Abdel‐Malek R, Farag DE, Shohdy KS, Cox S. Availability of informal caregivers for palliative care patients with cancer: is there a difference between higher‐ and lower‐income settings. Indian J Palliat Care. 2019; 25(3): 379‐ 382. doi: 10.4103/ijpc.Ijpc_199_18 31413452 PMC6659530 source
The Introduction calls family caregivers a cornerstone of long-term cancer care, citing shortages of health-care resources and personnel. The study compares a lower-income setting in Egypt with the UK, but it does not establish caregivers’ role specifically in low-resource settings in the United States or parts of Europe. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [128] Bamodu OA, Chung CC. Cancer care disparities: overcoming barriers to cancer control in low‐ and middle‐income countries. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024; 10: e2300439. doi: 10.1200/go.23.00439 39173080 source
The Task-Sharing and Developing Primary Care Capacity section describes nurses, clinicians, and community health workers providing cancer services in LMICs, but does not address patients’ caregivers or their central role. Searches for caregivers and family support found only a reference about caregivers’ willingness to vaccinate children, not evidence for the claimed role in cancer care or the stated US and European settings. No page number was available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [129] Breivik E, Ervik B, Kitzmüller G. Ambivalent and heavy burdened wanderers on a road less travelled: a meta‐ethnography on end‐of‐life care experiences among family caregivers in rural areas. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1): 1635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11875-3 39709414 PMC11663345 source
The Background (page unavailable) says families of people with cancer play a vital role in home-based palliative care and that rural areas often lack services. The Results (page unavailable) include rural studies from the USA, Norway, Scotland, and several African countries. The paper focuses on rural end-of-life care, however; it does not establish the claim for cancer care generally or across low- and middle-income countries as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
SMART or hybrid effectiveness-implementation models have already been successful in other chronic conditions.
“Such models, already successful in other chronic conditions, 138 adjust support dynamically based on need and timing and are well suited to dyadic care, in which patient and caregiver needs may diverge over time. 139 , 140”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [138] Jeitani A, Fahey PP, Gascoigne M, Darnal A, Lim D. Effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders: an umbrella review of meta‐analyses. Pers Med Psychiatry. 2024; 47: 100148. doi: 10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100140 source
The Introduction describes adaptive stepped care, and the results table (Characteristics of included systematic reviews; page unavailable) reports outcomes favoring stepped care for depression in patients who also have diabetes. That supports success for a related adaptive-care approach in a population with a chronic condition, but the paper does not establish that SMART or hybrid effectiveness-implementation models succeeded in treating other chronic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
In the short term (0.0-3.0 months), NPIs significantly reduced patient depression (g = 0.28).
“and depression (g = 0.28 for patients; g = 0.25 for caregivers).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the short term (0.0-3.0 months), NPIs significantly reduced caregiver depression (g = 0.25).
“and depression (g = 0.28 for patients; g = 0.25 for caregivers).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the short term (0.0-3.0 months), NPIs significantly reduced caregiver anxiety (g = 0.15).
“In the short term (0.0–3.0 months), NPIs also significantly reduced anxiety (g = 0.31 for patients; g = 0.15 for caregivers)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPIs delivered jointly to patients and caregivers yielded significant effects that were higher compared with NPIs delivered separately.
“NPIs delivered jointly to patients and caregivers yielded significant effects that were higher compared with NPIs delivered separately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPIs significantly reduced patient distress at 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.13).
“NPIs significantly reduced patient distress at both 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.13) and 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.18)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPIs did not significantly reduce caregiver distress.
“but NPIs did not significantly reduce caregiver distress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the short term (0.0-3.0 months), NPIs significantly reduced patient anxiety (g = 0.31).
“In the short term (0.0–3.0 months), NPIs also significantly reduced anxiety (g = 0.31 for patients; g = 0.15 for caregivers)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPIs significantly reduced patient distress at 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.18).
“NPIs significantly reduced patient distress at both 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.13) and 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.18)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Attrition rates at 3-month follow-up ranged from 1.0% to 52.0% (median, 13.0%).
“Attrition rates at 3‐month follow‐up ranged from 1.0% to 52.0% (median, 13.0%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 68 RCTs included a total of 6192 family caregivers (median, 61 family caregivers per study; range, 14-441 family caregivers per study).
“The 68 RCTs included a total of 6192 family caregivers (median, 61 family caregivers per study; range, 14–441 family caregivers per study).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of NPIs (k = 58) were developed based on a theoretical framework.
“The majority of NPIs (k = 58) were developed based on a theoretical framework”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patient caregiving was found in k = 51 protocols and provided practical information and skills for caregiving tasks, such as changing dressings or managing ostomy bags.
“Patient caregiving was found in k = 51 protocols and provided practical information and skills for caregiving tasks, such as changing dressings or managing ostomy bags.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Psychoeducation delivery was primarily didactic and unidirectional, aiming to foster understanding and, to a lesser extent, emotional engagement or behavior change.
“Delivery was primarily didactic and unidirectional, aiming to foster understanding and, to a lesser extent, emotional engagement or behavior change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Marital/family care was found in k = 57 protocols and provided patients and caregivers with tools to handle family and marital/relationship concerns, including effective communication, teamwork, and maintaining an intimate relationship.
“Marital/family care was found in k = 57 protocols and provided patients and caregivers with tools to handle family and marital/relationship concerns, including effective communication, teamwork, and maintaining an intimate relationship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most common combination of NPI types involved both psychoeducation and skills training and was identified in 26 RCTs.
“The most common combination of NPI types involved both psychoeducation and skills training and was identified in 26 RCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, the effect on anxiety was significant at 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.28; p = .023).
“For caregivers, the effect was significant at 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02–0.28; p = .023)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The enrollment rate was generally unrelated to NPI effects, except for patient depression.
“The enrollment rate was generally unrelated to NPI effects, except for patient depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Subgroup analyses by control type did not meaningfully moderate NPI effects.
“Subgroup analyses by control type did not meaningfully moderate NPI effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Delivery format emerged as an important moderator.
“Dose and duration were not associated with outcomes, but delivery format emerged as an important moderator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Meta-regression indicated that higher attrition was associated with smaller effects for patient and caregiver anxiety and for caregiver depression.
“Meta‐regression indicated that higher attrition was associated with smaller effects for patient and caregiver anxiety and for caregiver depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Other types of NPIs did not produce significant effects.
“Other types of NPIs did not produce significant effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPIs that combined face-to-face and remote delivery (mixed formats) significantly reduced patient distress, anxiety, and depression.
“NPIs that combined face‐to‐face and remote delivery (mixed formats) significantly reduced patient distress, anxiety, and depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Caregiver outcomes were less format-dependent.
“Caregiver outcomes were less format‐dependent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For patients, the effect on depression was significant at 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17-0.40; p = .000).
“For patients, the effect was significant at 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17–0.40; p = .000)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The median contact time was approximately 6 hours.
“The median contact time was approximately 6 hours, likely explaining the short‐term benefits and the limited durability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Hybrid models combining face-to-face sessions with remote guidance yielded larger patient effects than either format alone.
“Hybrid models combining face‐to‐face sessions with remote guidance yielded larger patient effects than either format alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For patient distress, the effect was not significant beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.05; 95% CI, −0.09, 0.18; p = .520).
“but not beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.05; 95% CI, −0.09, 0.18; p = .520; Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For patients, the effect on depression was not significant at 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.10; 95% CI, −0.07, 0.28; p = .254).
“but not at 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.10; 95% CI, −0.07, 0.28; p = .254)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For patients, the effect on anxiety was not significant at 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.17; 95% CI, −0.11, 0.45; p = .221).
“but not at 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.17; 95% CI, −0.11, 0.45; p = .221)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Q statistics indicated significant heterogeneity, reflecting variability in effect sizes across studies.
“Q statistics indicated significant heterogeneity, reflecting variability in effect sizes across studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A higher number of sessions was not linked to better outcomes.
“A higher number of sessions was not linked to better outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, the effect on depression was significant at 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.01-0.43; p = .037).
“and at 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.01–0.43; p = .037)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, the effect on anxiety was not significant at 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.11; 95% CI, −0.11, 0.33; p = .313).
“but not at 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.11; 95% CI, −0.11, 0.33; p = .313)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, the effect on depression was significant at 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.38; p = .000).
“For caregivers, the effect was significant at 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11–0.38; p = .000)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, there was no significant effect on distress beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.22; 95% CI, −0.07, 0.51; p = .140).
“or beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.22; 95% CI, −0.07, 0.51; p = .140; Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For patient distress, the effect was significant at 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.23; p = .008).
“For patients, the effect was significant at 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03–0.23; p = .008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For patient distress, the effect was significant at 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02-0.34; p = .027).
“and at 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02–0.34; p = .027)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For patients, the effect on depression was not significant beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.06; 95% CI, −0.18, 0.30; p = .623).
“or beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.06; 95% CI, −0.18, 0.30; p = .623; Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Effects did not differ significantly by patient or caregiver sex (female vs. male).
“Effects did not differ significantly by patient or caregiver sex (female vs. male).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For patients, the effect on anxiety was significant at 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.46; p = .000).
“For patients, the effect was significant at 0.0–3.0 months (g = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16–0.46; p = .000)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPI effects did not differ based on the year of publication.
“NPI effects did not differ based on the year of publication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, mixed-format NPIs reduced only depression.
“For caregivers, however, mixed‐format NPIs reduced only depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Subgroup analyses showed that differences in NPI content, delivery format, sample characteristics, and methodological quality contributed to the observed variation in NPI effects.
“Subgroup analyses showed that differences in NPI content, delivery format, sample characteristics, and methodological quality contributed to the observed variation in NPI effects (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, the effect on anxiety was not significant beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.15; 95% CI, −0.1, 0.40; p = .236).
“or beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.15; 95% CI, −0.1, 0.40; p = .236; Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Egger t-test detected no funnel plot asymmetry for all outcomes at 0.0-3.0 and 3.1-6.0 months.
“The Egger t‐test detected no funnel plot asymmetry for all outcomes at 0.0–3.0 and 3.1–6.0 months (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Compared with SEER data, early stage breast, colorectal, and lung cancers were underrepresented in this meta-analysis.
“Compared with SEER data, early stage breast, colorectal, and lung cancers were underrepresented in this meta‐analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The therapeutic counseling finding was not observed for distress.
“However, this finding was not observed for distress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For patients, the effect on anxiety was not significant beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.06; 95% CI, −0.25, 0.37; p = .700).
“or beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.06; 95% CI, −0.25, 0.37; p = .700; Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no consistent association between RoB category and effect magnitude.
“Finally, there was no consistent association between RoB category and effect magnitude (Figure 8; Figure S2 and Table S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, the effect on depression was not significant beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.25; 95% CI, −0.04, 0.54; p = .095).
“but not beyond 6.0 months (g = 0.25; 95% CI, −0.04, 0.54; p = .095; Figure 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers, there was no significant effect on distress at 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.22; 95% CI, −0.11, 0.55; p = .198).
“at 3.1–6.0 months (g = 0.22; 95% CI, −0.11, 0.55; p = .198)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dose and duration were not associated with outcomes.
“Dose and duration were not associated with outcomes, but delivery format emerged as an important moderator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lack of long-term follow-up limits understanding of the impact of NPIs on patients and caregivers with prolonged or delayed psychological symptoms.
“However, the lack of long‐term follow‐up limits our understanding of their impact on patients and caregivers with prolonged or delayed psychological symptoms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Dhumal et al. in 2023 did not replicate the finding.
“and was not replicated by Dhumal et al. 9 in 2023.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dhumal et al. 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The median contact time likely explains the short-term benefits and the limited durability.
“The median contact time was approximately 6 hours, likely explaining the short‐term benefits and the limited durability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Early benefits may remain clinically meaningful despite attenuation over time given the substantial time burden of cancer care for patients and caregivers.
“Nonetheless, early benefits may remain clinically meaningful despite attenuation over time given the substantial time burden of cancer care for patients and caregivers. 120”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] Gupta A, Eisenhauer EA, Booth CM. The time toxicity of cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(15): 1611‐ 1615. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.02810 35235366 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Caregivers would continue to have unmet needs without explicit strategies to address their symptoms.
“Caregivers would continue to have unmet needs without explicit strategies to address their symptoms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Leave-one-study-out sensitivity analyses confirmed that no single study changed the overall pattern of results at the three time points.
“The leave‐one‐study‐out sensitivity analyses confirmed that no single study changed the overall pattern of results at the three time points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The modest dose may be insufficient to sustain psychological improvements because distress can (re-)emerge in patients and caregivers during prolonged treatment.
“Although short‐term ΝPI benefits for patients are frequently reported, 24 , 117 , 118 this modest dose may be insufficient to sustain psychological improvements because distress can (re‐)emerge in patients and caregivers during prolonged treatment. 119”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [119] Götze H, Friedrich M, Taubenheim S, Dietz A, Lordick F, Mehnert A. Depression and anxiety in long‐term survivors 5 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28(1): 211‐ 220. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04805-1 31001695 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Evidence for scalable, caregiver-focused NPIs remains limited.
“Evidence for scalable, caregiver‐focused NPIs remains limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
This interpretation is limited by underreporting because 27 RCTs (39.7%) did not report disease stage.
“However, this interpretation is limited by underreporting because as 27 RCTs (39.7%) did not report disease stage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 59
- May combine two claims. 57
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationRisk of bias was assessed by two reviewers with the Cochrane RoB tool version 2.
“The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by two reviewers with the Cochrane RoB tool (version 2). 30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366: l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898 31462531 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe study was conducted according to current guidelines following the 2020 PRISMA statement.
“The study was conducted according to current guidelines 26 , 27 following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. 28”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [26] Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.5. Cochrane; 2024. Accessed July 7, 2025. www.cochrane.org/handbook
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27] Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, eds. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024. Accessed July 7, 2025. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global source
- cites [28] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 33782057 PMC8005924 source
The Abstract identifies this paper as the PRISMA 2020 statement and describes its guidance for reporting systematic reviews. The Scope of the guideline explicitly says PRISMA 2020 is not intended to guide systematic review conduct. The source therefore supports the reference to PRISMA 2020, but not the implication that it provides guidelines for how the study was conducted. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSix publications reporting outcomes from three different RCTs were considered as single studies.
“Six publications reporting outcomes from three different RCTs 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 were considered as single studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [38] Badr H, Herbert K, Chhabria K, Sandulache VC, Chiao EY, Wagner T. Self‐management intervention for head and neck cancer couples: results of a randomized pilot trial. Cancer. 2019; 125(7): 1176‐ 1184. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31906 30521075 PMC6420382 source
- cites [39] Badr H, Herbert K, Bonnen MD, Asper JA, Wagner T. Dyadic coping in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer and their spouses. Front Psychol. 2018; 9: 1780. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01780 30374316 PMC6196240 source
- cites [40] Clark MM, Rummans TA, Atherton PJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of maintaining quality of life during radiotherapy for advanced cancer. Cancer. 2013; 119(4): 880‐ 887. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27776 22930253 PMC4405146 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationContemporary trends favor self-directed technologies (e.g., mobile applications) compared with in-person or clinic-based approaches.
“with contemporary trends favoring self‐directed technologies (e.g., mobile applications) compared with in‐person or clinic‐based approaches, 20”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Ferrell B, Wittenberg E. A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67(4): 318‐ 325. doi: 10.3322/caac.21396 28319263 source
The Discussion (page not available in our copy) reports increased attention to home-based caregiver interventions and says self-directed technology is on the rise compared with earlier reliance on face-to-face clinical visits. It does not identify mobile applications as an example or say self-directed technologies are favored over other formats; telephone contact was the most prevalent format. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationTherapeutic counseling may work by fostering emotional exploration and patient-caregiver dialogue.
“Therapeutic counseling may work by fostering emotional exploration and patient–caregiver dialogue. 121 , 122”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [121] Stanton A, Luecken L, MacKinnon D, Thompson E. Mechanisms in psychosocial interventions for adults living with cancer: opportunity for integration of theory, research, and practice. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012; 81(2): 318‐ 335. doi: 10.1037/a0028833 22663900 source
- cites [122] Cook SC, Schwartz AC, Kaslow NJ. Evidence‐based psychotherapy: advantages and challenges. Neurotherapeutics. 2017; 14(3): 537‐ 545. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0549-4 28653278 PMC5509639 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPsychosocial support is limited by resource constraints.
“Psychosocial support is limited by resource constraints. 126”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [126] Kayser K, Brydon DM, Moon H, Zebrack B. Institutional capacity to provide psychosocial care in cancer programs: addressing barriers to delivering quality cancer care. Psychooncology. 2020; 29(12): 1995‐ 2002. doi: 10.1002/pon.5488 32691456 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh caregiver distress is associated with poorer quality of care, greater unplanned health care use, and higher caregiver symptom burden.
“High caregiver distress is associated with poorer quality of care, 16 greater unplanned health care use, 114 , 115 and higher caregiver symptom burden. 116”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Ehlers SL, Davis K, Bluethmann SM, et al. Screening for psychosocial distress among patients with cancer: implications for clinical practice, healthcare policy, and dissemination to enhance cancer survivorship. Transl Behav Med. 2018; 9(2): 282‐ 291. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby123 PMC6610173 30566662 source
Citation 16 is attached to the poorer-quality-of-care clause; the later clauses have separate citations. The Introduction (page unavailable) says caregivers can experience distress and that identifying and addressing distress can help improve quality of care. It does not establish an association between high caregiver distress and poorer quality of care. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [114] Badger T, Segrin C, Crane TE, et al. Symptom management interventions influence unscheduled health services use among cancer survivors and caregivers. J Cancer Surviv. Published online November 29, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01723-y PMC12151082 39612086 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says symptom burden often drives unscheduled health-service use and identifies psychological distress among symptoms reported by cancer caregivers. It does not establish that caregivers with higher distress have greater unplanned health-care use; the association it explicitly reports for greater use is with younger age and more comorbid conditions. The other clauses of the citing sentence have separate citations and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [115] Qdaisat A, Stroh E, Reyes‐Gibby C, et al. Severity of symptoms as an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with advanced cancer presenting to the emergency department: secondary analysis of a prospective randomized study. Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23): 3988. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233988 39682175 PMC11640218 source
The citation appears to support the clause about greater unplanned health care use. The Introduction discusses ED visits and hospitalization among patients with advanced cancer, but does not link that use to caregiver distress. A search for caregiver distress and health care use found no passage establishing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe systematic review and meta-analysis included 68 randomized controlled trials with a total of 11,987 participants.
“The authors included 68 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 11,987 participants.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“This meta‐analysis includes 68 RCTs (70 reports because of two pairs of reports from two different RCTs) published between 1983 and 2025, all with complete data for calculating effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPsychoeducation (k = 9) focused primarily on increasing knowledge through structured information about cancer, treatment, symptom management, and psychosocial impacts.
“Psychoeducation (k = 9) focused primarily on increasing knowledge through structured information about cancer, treatment, symptom management, and psychosocial impacts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEnrollment rates varied from 10.0% to 94.0%, with a median of 55.0%, although this information was not reported for all RCTs.
“Enrollment rates varied from 10.0% to 94.0%, with a median of 55.0%, although this information was not reported for all RCTs (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe 68 RCTs included 74 primary NPIs as their experimental arms.
“The 68 RCTs included 74 primary NPIs as their experimental arms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn protocols that combined joint and separate delivery (k = 8), the content was usually identical (k = 5) or was tailored by duration (k = 2) or by both content and duration (k = 1).
“In protocols that combined joint and separate delivery (k = 8), the content was usually identical (k = 5) or was tailored by duration (k = 2) or by both content and duration (k = 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong the RCTs reporting sex (n = 64), 53.6% of patients were female.
“Among the RCTs reporting sex (n = 64), 53.6% of patients were female.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost protocols were delivered by psychologists (k = 21) or nurses (k = 21), followed by social workers (k = 17).
“Most protocols were delivered by psychologists (k = 21) or nurses (k = 21), followed by social workers (k = 17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong the RCTs reporting race/ethnicity (n = 32), patients were predominantly Caucasian (72.6%), followed by Hispanic (13.6%), African American (7.1%), and Asian (1.6%).
“Among the RCTs reporting race/ethnicity (n = 32), patients were predominantly Caucasian (72.6%), followed by Hispanic (13.6%), African American (7.1%), and Asian (1.6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen delivered separately (k = 10), content was identical in one half of the studies (k = 5) or was tailored by duration (k = 4) or by both content and duration (k = 1).
“When delivered separately (k = 10), content was identical in one half of the studies (k = 5) or was tailored by duration (k = 4) or by both content and duration (k = 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of NPIs (k = 74) exceeds the number of reports (N = 68) because five included more than one experimental arm.
“The number of NPIs (k = 74) exceeds the number of reports (N = 68) because five included more than one experimental arm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenBehavior modification (k = 6) included NPIs that targeted sustained lifestyle changes, including physical activity, nutrition, or sleep, using behavior change strategies, such as goal-setting and self-monitoring.
“Behavior modification (k = 6) included NPIs that targeted sustained lifestyle changes, including physical activity, nutrition, or sleep, using behavior change strategies, such as goal‐setting and self‐monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSkills training (k = 20) was interactive and aimed at strengthening practical abilities, such as improving symptom management, and/or psychological skills, including coping, problem-solving, stress management, communication, and adaptability to make caregiving more effective.
“Skills training (k = 20) was interactive and aimed at strengthening practical abilities, such as improving symptom management, and/or psychological skills, including coping, problem‐solving, stress management, communication, and adaptability to make caregiving more effective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNPIs were categorized into four primary types based on their core therapeutic approach and delivery focus.
“NPIs were categorized into four primary types based on their core therapeutic approach and delivery focus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost RCTs were conducted in the United States (n = 40), followed by China (n = 9) and Canada (n = 5).
“Most RCTs were conducted in the United States (n = 40), followed by China (n = 9) and Canada (n = 5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataGroup meetings were the least common delivery format (k = 6).
“Group meetings were the least common delivery format (k = 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost RCTs included patients with one type of cancer (64.7% homogeneous), whereas 35.3% included multiple types of cancer.
“Most RCTs included patients with one type of cancer (64.7% homogeneous), whereas 35.3% included multiple types of cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe total number of hours of NPIs had a median of 6.0 hours and a range of 0.43-30.0 hours.
“The dose and duration of each NPI were calculated as the total number of hours (median, 6.0 hours; range, 0.43–30.0 hours), the total number of sessions (median, 6.0 sessions; range, 1.0–56.0 sessions), and the duration in weeks (median, 6.0 weeks; range, 0.14–27.0 weeks).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSelf-directed communication technology, such as mobile applications, was used in k = 18 protocols.
“Self‐directed communication technology, such as mobile applications, was used in k = 18 protocols.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost RCTs assessed outcomes within the first 3 months (n = 59), whereas fewer evaluated intermediate (3.1-6.0 months) and long-term (>6 months) outcomes (n = 22 and n = 14, respectively).
“Most RCTs assessed outcomes within the first 3 months (n = 59), whereas fewer evaluated intermediate (3.1–6.0 months) and long‐term (>6 months) outcomes (n = 22 and n = 14, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost protocols were delivered to patients and caregivers together simultaneously (k = 50).
“Most protocols were delivered to patients and caregivers together simultaneously (k = 50).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost common cancer types were breast (27.7%), colorectal (18.1%), and lung (16.3%) cancers.
“Most common cancer types were breast (27.7%), colorectal (18.1%), and lung (16.3%) cancers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe total number of sessions of NPIs had a median of 6.0 sessions and a range of 1.0-56.0 sessions.
“The dose and duration of each NPI were calculated as the total number of hours (median, 6.0 hours; range, 0.43–30.0 hours), the total number of sessions (median, 6.0 sessions; range, 1.0–56.0 sessions), and the duration in weeks (median, 6.0 weeks; range, 0.14–27.0 weeks).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTherapeutic counseling (k = 33) emphasized active dialogue between the counselor and participants to address the psychosocial impact of cancer, build a supportive relationship, and encourage reflection, expression, and meaning-making around illness and caregiving.
“Therapeutic counseling (k = 33) emphasized active dialogue between the counselor (e.g., psychologist, nurse, social worker) and participants to address the psychosocial impact of cancer, build a supportive relationship, and encourage reflection, expression, and meaning‐making around illness and caregiving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 68 RCTs involved a total of 5795 patients (median, 64 patients per study; range, 14-302 patients per study).
“The 68 RCTs involved a total of 5795 patients (median, 64 patients per study; range, 14–302 patients per study).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe duration in weeks of NPIs had a median of 6.0 weeks and a range of 0.14-27.0 weeks.
“The dose and duration of each NPI were calculated as the total number of hours (median, 6.0 hours; range, 0.43–30.0 hours), the total number of sessions (median, 6.0 sessions; range, 1.0–56.0 sessions), and the duration in weeks (median, 6.0 weeks; range, 0.14–27.0 weeks).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost NPIs were delivered through guided communication technology (phone or videocall conference; k = 43), followed by face-to-face visits (k = 39).
“Most NPIs were delivered through guided communication technology (phone or videocall conference; k = 43), followed by face‐to‐face visits (k = 39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong protocols that were delivered face-to-face, the largest proportion took place in an unspecified location (k = 23), followed by clinical settings (k = 18), or at patients' homes (k = 6).
“Among protocols that were delivered face‐to‐face, the largest proportion took place in an unspecified location (k = 23), followed by clinical settings (k = 18), or at patients' homes (k = 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCaregivers were identified by the patient and were subsequently invited to participate in most RCTs (n = 29).
“Caregivers were identified by the patient and were subsequently invited to participate in most RCTs (n = 29).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataApproximately one in three protocols (k = 21) combined face-to-face sessions with additional guided communication technology contact.
“Approximately one in three protocols (k = 21) combined face‐to‐face sessions with additional guided communication technology contact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most common theoretical frameworks were cognitive behavioral theory (k = 8), social cognitive theory (k = 6), and theory of stress and coping (k = 5).
“most commonly cognitive behavioral theory (k = 8), social cognitive theory (k = 6), and theory of stress and coping (k = 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSelf-care was found in k = 65 protocols for patients and k = 64 protocols for caregivers and provided strategies to manage one's well-being, maintain social support, and access resources.
“Self‐care was found in k = 65 protocols for patients and k = 64 protocols for caregivers and provided strategies to manage one’s well‐being, maintain social support, and access resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAlternatively, both individuals of the dyad were approached e.g., during clinic visits (n = 25).
“Alternatively, both individuals of the dyad were approached e.g., during clinic visits (n = 25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCancer stage was reported in 41 RCTs: 62.1% included patients with stage 0-III disease; 32.5% included those with stage IV disease; and, for 5.4% of RCTs, this information was missing.
“Cancer stage was reported in 41 RCTs: 62.1% included patients with stage 0–III disease; 32.5% included those with stage IV disease; and, for 5.4% of RCTs, this information was missing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAssessment of fidelity was mentioned in k = 47 protocols, e.g., through NPI manuals and checklists, recording and random review of sessions, or regular supervision with feedback to the interventionists.
“Assessment of fidelity was mentioned in k = 47 protocols, e.g., through NPI manuals and checklists, recording and random review of sessions, or regular supervision with feedback to the interventionists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor the RCTs that included follow-up assessments at 3.1-6.0 months and >6.0 months, median attrition rates were 22.0% and 21.0%, respectively.
“For the RCTs that included follow‐up assessments at 3.1–6.0 months and >6.0 months, median attrition rates were 22.0% and 21.0%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost RCTs were published in the past 5 years (n = 39).
“and were published in the past 5 years (n = 39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTherapeutic counseling appeared to be associated with significant reductions in anxiety among patients and in depression among both patients and caregivers.
“Therapeutic counseling appeared to be associated with significant reductions in anxiety among patients and in depression among both patients and caregivers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRemote interventions significantly reduced patient anxiety and depression, whereas face-to-face NPIs reduced caregiver depression.
“Remote interventions significantly reduced patient anxiety and depression, whereas face‐to‐face NPIs reduced caregiver depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPatients with colorectal cancer and their caregivers experienced significant reductions in anxiety and depression, and patients with breast cancer experienced significant reductions in anxiety.
“Regarding cancer type, patients with colorectal cancer and their caregivers experienced significant reductions in anxiety and depression, and patients with breast cancer experienced significant reductions in anxiety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen delivered to patients and caregivers together, NPIs significantly reduced distress in patients and anxiety and depression in both groups.
“When delivered to patients and caregivers together, NPIs significantly reduced distress in patients and anxiety and depression in both groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCaregiver sex was reported in 64 RCTs; most caregivers were female (57.6%) and spouses (79.7%).
“Caregiver sex was reported in 64 RCTs. Most were caregivers were female (57.6%) and spouses (79.7%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStage-specific analyses indicated benefits among patients with stage 0-III disease for anxiety and caregiver depression, but not among patients with stage IV disease and their caregivers.
“Stage‐specific analyses indicated benefits among patients with stage 0–III disease for anxiety and caregiver depression, but not among patients with stage IV disease and their caregivers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe certainty of evidence (GRADE) was generally moderate for short-term outcomes and was low to very low for longer term effects, mainly because of RoB, heterogeneity, and imprecision.
“The certainty of evidence (GRADE [Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation] assessments; see Table S3) was generally moderate for short‐term outcomes and was low to very low for longer term effects, mainly because of RoB, heterogeneity, and imprecision (see Table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPossible publication bias was observed for patient distress and for caregiver anxiety and depression at >6.0 months.
“Possible publication bias was observed for patient distress and for caregiver anxiety and depression at >6.0 months”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor caregivers, there was no significant effect on distress at 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.05; 95% CI, −0.14, 0.24; p = .581).
“For caregivers, there was no significant effect at 0.0–3.9 months (g = 0.05; 95% CI, −0.14, 0.24; p = .581)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenNPIs produced strong effects in patients with colorectal cancer for almost all outcomes, particularly when colorectal cancer was among the three most common diagnoses in the sample.
“NPIs produced strong effects in patients with colorectal cancer for almost all outcomes, particularly when colorectal cancer was among the three most common diagnoses in the sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTherapeutic counseling was the most common NPI and produced the largest, statistically significant reductions in patient and caregiver anxiety and depression.
“Therapeutic counseling was the most common NPI and produced the largest, statistically significant reductions in patient and caregiver anxiety and depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth multicenter and single-center RCTs showed significant reductions in patient and caregiver anxiety and depression.
“Both multicenter and single‐center RCTs showed significant reductions in patient and caregiver anxiety and depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSingle-center RCTs consistently yielded larger effects than multicenter RCTs, possibly because of more homogeneous samples.
“However, single‐center RCTs consistently yielded larger effects than multicenter RCTs, possibly because of more homogeneous samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe median age of caregivers was 51.7 years (range, 39.5-66.6 years).
“The median age of caregivers was 51.7 years (range, 39.5–66.6 years).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAmong patients with stage IV disease, breast cancer was overrepresented, colorectal cancer was aligned with SEER data, and lung cancer was underrepresented.
“Among patients with stage IV disease, breast cancer was overrepresented, colorectal cancer was aligned with SEER data, and lung cancer was underrepresented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong the studies reporting race/ethnicity (n = 35), caregivers were predominantly Caucasian (81.4%), followed by African American (6.3%), Hispanic (5.6%), and Asian (1.4%).
“Among the studies reporting race/ethnicity (n = 35), caregivers were predominantly Caucasian (81.4%), followed by African American (6.3%), Hispanic (5.6%), and Asian (1.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCertainty of evidence ranged from moderate for short-term to low or very low for longer term outcomes, driven by limited long-term data and RCT quality.
“Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate for short‐term to low or very low for longer term outcomes, driven by limited long‐term data and RCT quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenNPI duration was generally brief, and greater dose was not associated with better outcomes.
“NPI duration was generally brief, and greater dose was not associated with better outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCaregivers in excluded studies were younger.
“Caregivers in excluded studies were younger (see Figure S1)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFor each outcome, validated measures reported in the RCT were used.
“For each outcome, we used validated measures reported in the RCT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWhen multiple publications reported outcomes from the same RCT, data were extracted as a single study.
“When multiple publications reported outcomes from the same RCT, data were extracted as a single study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningData were pooled using a random-effects model, with studies weighted by the inverse of their sampling variance, to account for heterogeneity in NPI content, delivery format, and sample characteristics.
“Data were pooled using a random‐effects model, with studies weighted by the inverse of their sampling variance, to account for heterogeneity in NPI content, delivery format, and sample characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataReferences were screened by two independent reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a senior team member.
“deduplicated, and screened by two independent reviewers; conflicts were resolved by a senior team member.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationCertainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed using GRADE.
“Certainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. 36”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, eds. GRADE handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group; 2013. Accessed July 7, 2025. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenPublication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger t-test, with significance based on one-tailed p values.
“Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger t‐test, with significance based on one‐tailed p values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningOnly RCTs were included to ensure similar methodological rigor and reliability of conclusions.
“Only RCTs were included to ensure similar methodological rigor and the reliability of conclusions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe research protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024536629).
“The research protocol was registered with the international Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier CRD42024536629) and provides a detailed description of the project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSensitivity analyses used the leave-one-study-out approach for each outcome and follow-up time point.
“To assess the robustness of pooled effect sizes, sensitivity analyses used the leave‐one‐study‐out approach 33 for each outcome and follow‐up time point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Viechtbauer W, Cheung MWL. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta‐analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010; 1(2): 112‐ 125. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.11 26061377 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNPIs can help manage distress in patients and reduce anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers.
“NPIs can help manage distress in patients and reduce anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenTwo reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and outcomes by intervention group and follow-up period for patients and caregivers.
“Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and outcomes by intervention group and follow‐up period for patients and caregivers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationResources to address distress, anxiety, and depression in patients with cancer and family caregivers are often inadequate, perpetuating adverse effects of the disease and its treatments and increasing the estimated annual €199 billion global economic burden of cancer.
“However, resources to address distress, anxiety, and depression in patients with cancer and family caregivers are often inadequate, perpetuating adverse effects of the disease and its treatments 5 and increasing the estimated annual €199 billion global economic burden of cancer. 17 , 18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Carlson LE, Zelinski EL, Toivonen KI, et al. Prevalence of psychosocial distress in cancer patients across 55 North American cancer centers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019; 37(1): 5‐ 21. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1521490 30592249 source
- cites [17] Hofmarcher T, Lindgren P, Wilking N, Jönsson B. The cost of cancer in Europe 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 129: 41‐ 49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.011 32120274 source
- cites [18] Coumoundouros C, Ould Brahim L, Lambert SD, McCusker J. The direct and indirect financial costs of informal cancer care: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2019; 27(5): e622‐ e636. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12808 31293013 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNorthouse et al. did not find any effect of NPIs on caregiver depression, a finding confirmed by Pang et al.
“Northouse et al. 19 did not find any effect of NPIs on caregiver depression, a finding that was confirmed by Pang et al. 21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Northouse et al. 19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pang et al. 21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe meta-analyses by Pang et al. and Dhumal et al. did not report the timeframe for assessing NPI effects, which may partially explain inconsistencies.
“The meta‐analyses by Pang et al. 21 and Dhumal et al. 9 did not report the timeframe for assessing NPI effects, which may partially explain these inconsistencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pang et al. 21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Dhumal et al. 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPang et al. in 2022 partially confirmed the effect for patients, but not for caregivers.
“a finding that was partially confirmed by Pang et al. 21 in 2022 for patients, but not for caregivers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pang et al. 21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2019, Northouse et al. reported that NPIs showed small but significant effects on caregiver distress and anxiety beyond 6 months.
“In 2019, Northouse et al. 19 reported that NPIs showed small but significant effects on caregiver distress and anxiety beyond 6 months”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Northouse et al. 19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAlthough the number of randomized clinical trials has increased notably over the past 20 years, findings have been inconsistent because of heterogeneity of NPIs, modes of delivery, and assessment time points.
“Although the number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) has increased notably over the past 20 years, findings have been inconsistent because heterogeneity of NPIs, modes of delivery, and assessment time points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFamily caregivers assume essential responsibilities for an average 8 hours per day for 14 months.
“with family caregivers assuming essential responsibilities for an average 8 hours per day for 14 months. 2 , 3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Sun V, Puts M, Haase K, et al. The role of family caregivers in the care of older adults with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021; 37(6): 151232. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151232 34753644 source
- cites [3] Yabroff RK, Kim Y. Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2009; 115(S18): 4362‐ 4373. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24588 19731345 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSEER data from 2013 to 2022 show stage IV diagnoses in 6.0% of patients with breast cancer, 21.8% of those with colorectal cancer, and 47.4% of those with lung cancer.
“Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 2013 to 2022 124 show stage IV diagnoses in 6.0% of patients with breast cancer, 21.8% of those with colorectal cancer, and 47.4% of those with lung cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] National Cancer Institute; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Explorer: An interactive website for SEER cancer statistics. National Cancer Institute; 2025. Accessed July 17, 2025. https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics‐network/explorer/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNPIs showed the strongest effects within 0.0-3.0 months postintervention and generally became nonsignificant afterward, except for patient distress and caregiver depression, which remained significant up to 3.1-6.0 months.
“NPIs showed the strongest effects within 0.0–3.0 months postintervention and generally became nonsignificant afterward, except for patient distress and caregiver depression, which remained significant up to 3.1–6.0 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEffects were stronger in patients with stage 0-III disease, especially for patient anxiety and caregiver depression, possibly reflecting better prognosis and shorter treatment.
“Effects were also stronger in patients with stage 0–III disease, especially for patient anxiety and caregiver depression, possibly reflecting better prognosis and shorter treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataHigher attrition was associated with smaller effects, suggesting that retention may also indicate NPI feasibility and effectiveness.
“Higher attrition was associated with smaller effects, suggesting that retention may also indicate NPI feasibility and effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAcross outcomes and timepoints, NPIs showed more consistent benefits for patients than for caregivers, with the strongest effects observed in the short-term for anxiety and depression.
“Across outcomes and timepoints, NPIs showed more consistent benefits for patients than for caregivers, with the strongest effects observed in the short‐term for anxiety and depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataStructured NPIs can provide short-term benefits for patients with cancer and modest effects for family caregivers.
“In summary, structured NPIs can provide short‐term benefits for patients with cancer and modest effects for family caregivers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe use of pharmacologic treatments for psychological symptoms was addressed only in two RCTs and could not be systematically examined in this analysis.
“The use of pharmacologic treatments for psychological symptoms was addressed only in two RCTs and could not be systematically examined in this analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningEffect attenuation may reflect unmeasured factors, such as timing, continuity, or context, rather than the number of sessions and duration.
“Effect attenuation may reflect unmeasured factors, such as timing, continuity, or context, rather than the number of sessions and duration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough effects were not statistically significant, NPIs may help achieve clinically meaningful outcomes.
“Although effects were not statistically significant, NPIs may help achieve clinically meaningful outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTwelve studies were excluded because of incomplete or incompatible data.
“Twelve studies were excluded because of incomplete or incompatible data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis review synthesizes NPIs that target patients and family caregivers using rigorous meta-analytic methods, including prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses across all outcomes and time points.
“This review synthesizes NPIs that target patients and family caregivers using rigorous meta‐analytic methods, including prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses across all outcomes and time points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAdditional limitations include the exclusion of patients with hematologic malignancies and recruitment of dyads in which both members were willing and able to participate, limiting generalizability to vulnerable patients without caregiver support.
“Additional limitations include the exclusion of patients with hematologic malignancies and recruitment of dyads in which both members were willing and able to participate, limiting generalizability to vulnerable patients without caregiver support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGeneralizability of the current results is limited by the concentration of RCTs in high-income countries, predominantly female and Caucasian samples, and poor reporting of race/ethnicity outside the United States.
“Generalizability of the current results is limited by the concentration of RCTs in high‐income countries, predominantly female and Caucasian samples, and poor reporting of race/ethnicity outside the United States, which is critical information for promoting cultural relevance in psychosocial oncology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCaregiver effects were weaker, in which distress did not improve, and only depression showed sustained benefit beyond 3 months.
“Caregiver effects were weaker, in which distress did not improve, and only depression showed sustained benefit beyond 3 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe inclusion of diverse NPI types, delivery formats, and cancer populations enhances generalizability.
“The inclusion of diverse NPI types, delivery formats, and cancer populations enhances generalizability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenOutcomes assessed after patient death, including bereavement-related distress, were outside the scope of this analysis.
“Outcomes assessed after patient death, including bereavement‐related distress, were outside the scope of this analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningHeterogeneity across studies, including variation in NPI characteristics and duration, reflects a limitation of the current literature that influences the precision of pooled effect estimates and warrants cautious interpretation.
“Heterogeneity across studies, including variation in NPI characteristics and duration, reflects a limitation of the current literature that influences the precision of pooled effect estimates and warrants cautious interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNPI effects for patients were strongest at 0-3 months, with little evidence of sustained benefit thereafter.
“NPI effects for patients were strongest at 0–3 months, with little evidence of sustained benefit thereafter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenLimitations include RoB assessment only for primary outcomes of each RCT.
“Limitations include RoB assessment only for primary outcomes of each RCT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The outcome measures for distress, anxiety, and depression across the included RCTs are sufficiently comparable to be pooled in meta-analysis.
“Table 3 reports pooled effect sizes, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), heterogeneity across studies (Q statistic), and publication bias (Egger t‐test).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Egger t-test is a valid method for assessing publication bias in this meta-analysis.
“The Egger t‐test detected no funnel plot asymmetry for all outcomes at 0.0–3.0 and 3.1–6.0 months (Table 3).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The median contact time of approximately 6 hours is a meaningful measure of intervention dose.
“The median contact time was approximately 6 hours, likely explaining the short‐term benefits and the limited durability.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Caregiver-distress short-term interval changes to 0.0-3.9 months
MinorThe caregiver-distress result in the prose uses 0.0-3.9 months, while the corresponding Table 3 row and Figure 3 caption specify 0.0-3.0 months.
“For caregivers, there was no significant effect at 0.0–3.9 months (g = 0.05; 95% CI, −0.14, 0.24; p = .581)”
“Figure: FIGURE 3 Effect sizes for caregiver distress presented for three time periods: 0.0–3.0 months, 3.1–6.0 months, >6.0 months.”
Multicenter caregiver-depression result is called significant despite p = .052
MinorThe text says multicenter RCTs showed significant reductions in caregiver depression, but Table 4 gives that subgroup p = .052 and a confidence interval crossing zero. The row also carries a significance asterisk despite the table's definition of that symbol as p < .05.
“Both multicenter and single‐center RCTs showed significant reductions in patient and caregiver anxiety and depression.”
“| Multi‐center | 30 | 2960 | 0.17 (−0.002, 0.33)* | .052 | 160.24** |”
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898 · Cited by 33,583 · cited 1× · see citing works
“30”
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225 · cited 1× · see citing works
“31,32 Standardized mean differences, representing the effect size between treatment and control groups, were calculated using the Hedges g unbiased approach 31 from means, standard deviations, sample sizes, and differences in mean scores, standardized by the postscore standard deviation.”
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771 · see citing works
Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis
Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.11 · Cited by 2,949 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To assess the robustness of pooled effect sizes, sensitivity analyses used the leave - one - study - out approach 33 for each outcome and follow - up time point.”
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
(2024) · doi:10.46658/jbimes-24-01 · Cited by 2,483 · see citing works
Mitchell, A. J., Chan, M., Bhatti, H., Halton, M., Grassi, L., Johansen, C., & Meader, N. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70002-x · Cited by 2,449 · see citing works
Interventions with Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Northouse, L. L., Katapodi, M. C., Song, L., Zhang, L., & Mood, D. W. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20081 · Cited by 857 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Northouse et al. 19 did not find any effect of NPIs on caregiver depression, a finding that was confirmed by Pang et al. 21 The meta - analyses by Pang et al. 21 and Dhumal et al. 9 did not report the timeframe for assessing NPI effects, which may partially explain these inconsistencies.”
Self-citationMicrorandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions.
Klasnja, P., Hekler, E. B., Shiffman, S., Boruvka, A., Almirall, D., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000305 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Dionne-Odom, J. N., Azuero, A., Lyons, K. D., Hull, J. G., Tosteson, T. D., Li, Z., Li, Z., Frost, J., Dragnev, K. H., Akyar, İ., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.58.7824 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
The Impact of Caregiving on the Psychological Well-Being of Family Caregivers and Cancer Patients
Northouse, L. L., Katapodi, M. C., Schafenacker, A. M., & Weiss, D. (2012) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2012.09.006 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Self-citationGeng, H.-M., Chuang, D.-M., Yang, F., Yang, Y., Liu, W.-M., Liu, L.-H., & Tian, H.-M. (2018) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000011863 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
The time toxicity of cancer treatment
Gupta, A., Eisenhauer, E. A., & Booth, C. M. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.02810 · Cited by 356 · cited 1× · see citing works
“120 Because extended treat-ment periods may increase delayed psychosocial challenges, NPIs that provide longer - term support for patients and caregivers are needed to strengthen evidence and improve care.”
The cost of cancer in Europe 2018
Hofmarcher, T., Lindgren, P., Wilking, N., & Jönsson, B. (2020) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.011 · Cited by 327 · cited 1× · see citing works
“17,18 25 Although the number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) has increased notably over the past 20 years, findings have been inconsistent because heterogeneity of NPIs, modes of delivery, and assessment time points.”
Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors
Yabroff, K. R., & Kim, Y. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24588 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Psychological distress and cancer mortality
Hamer, M., Chida, Y., & Molloy, G. J. (2009) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.11.002 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Depression and anxiety in long-term survivors 5 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis
Götze, H., Friedrich, M., Taubenheim, S., Dietz, A., Lordick, F., & Mehnert, A. (2020) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04805-1 · Cited by 281 · cited 1× · see citing works
“119 Nonetheless, early benefits may remain clinically meaningful despite attenuation over time given the substantial time burden of cancer care for patients and caregivers.”
A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology
Ferrell, B., & Wittenberg, E. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21396 · Cited by 256 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…depression for patients with cancer and family caregivers continues to grow, with contemporary trends favoring self - directed technologies (e.g., mobile applications) compared with in - person or clinic - based approaches, 20 ongoing assessment is essential to guide the allocation of resources.”
Thomas, J., McDonald, S., Noel-Storr, A., Shemilt, I., Elliott, J., Mavergames, C., & Marshall, I. J. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.003 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Evidence-Based Psychotherapy: Advantages and Challenges
Cook, S. C., Schwartz, A. C., & Kaslow, N. J. (2017) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-017-0549-4 · Cited by 252 · cited 1× · see citing works
“121,122 In contrast, psy-choeducational NPIs are more informational, involving less active dialogue, whereas behavioral change and skills - based NPIs are usually prescriptive or focus on applied techniques.”
Prevalence of psychosocial distress in cancer patients across 55 North American cancer centers
Carlson, L. E., Zelinski, E. L., Toivonen, K. I., Sundstrom, L., Jobin, C. T., Damaskos, P., & Zebrack, B. (2019) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2018.1521490 · Cited by 237 · cited 1× · see citing works
“16 However, resources to address distress, anxiety, and depression in patients with cancer and family caregivers are often inadequate, perpetuating adverse effects of the disease and its treatments 5 and increasing the estimated annual €199 billion global economic burden of cancer.”
Badr, H., Smith, C. B., Goldstein, N. E., Gomez, J. E., & Redd, W. H. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29009 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Kershaw, T., Ellis, K. R., Yoon, H., Schafenacker, A., Katapodi, M. C., & Northouse, L. (2015) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-015-9743-y · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationDepression and Anxiety in Women With Breast Cancer and Their Partners
Badger, T. A., Segrin, C. G., Dorros, S. M., Meek, P., & López, A. M. (2006) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-200701000-00006 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
A couple‐based intervention for female breast cancer
Baucom, D. H., Porter, L. S., Kirby, J. S., Gremore, T. M., Wiesenthal, N., Aldridge, W. A., Fredman, S. J., Stanton, S. E., Scott, J. L., Halford, W. K., et al. (2008) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1395 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Existential distress in cancer: <scp>A</scp> lleviating suffering from fundamental loss and change
Vehling, S., & Kissane, D. W. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4872 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Campbell, L. C., Keefe, F. J., Scipio, C., McKee, D. C., Edwards, C. L., Herman, S. H., Johnson, L. E., Colvin, O. M., McBride, C. M., & Donatucci, C. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22355 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Kubo, A., Kurtovich, E., McGinnis, M., Aghaee, S., Altschuler, A., Quesenberry, C., Kolevska, T., & Avins, A. L. (2019) · Integrative Cancer Therapies · doi:10.1177/1534735419850634 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
McLean, L. M., Walton, T., Rodin, G., Esplen, M. J., & Jones, J. M. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2046 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Kuijer, R. G., Buunk, B. P., de Jong, G. M., Ybema, J. F., & Sanderman, R. (2003) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.749 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Cancer Care Disparities: Overcoming Barriers to Cancer Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Bamodu, O. A., & Chung, C.-C. (2024) · JCO Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/go.23.00439 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Baucom, D. H., Hurwitz, H., Moser, B., Patterson, E., & Kim, H. J. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24578 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Twelve studies (13 reports because of one pair of publications from the same RCT 42,43 ) lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs (e.g., re - randomization, multiple overlapping intervention arms) and were included only in the narrative synthesis (see Supporting Methods, Tables S1 and S2…”
Schellekens, M. P. J., van den Hurk, D. G. M., Prins, J. B., Donders, A. R. T., Molema, J., Dekhuijzen, R., van der Drift, M. A., & Speckens, A. E. M. (2017) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4430 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Understanding and supporting informal cancer caregivers
Molassiotis, A., & Wang, M. (2022) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Postmastectomy Couple Counseling: An Outcome Study of a Structured Treatment Protocol
Christensen, D. N. (1983) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926238308410913 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Badger, T., Segrin, C., Figueredo, A., Harrington, J. M., Sheppard, K., Passalacqua, S. A., Pasvogel, A., & Bishop, M. C. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9822-2 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Kozachik, S., Given, C. W., Given, B. A., Pierce, S. J., Azzouz, F., Rawl, S. M., & Champion, V. L. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Barry, V., Stout, M. E., Lynch, M. E., Mattis, S., Tran, D. Q., Antun, A. G., Ribeiro, M. J., Stein, S. F., & Kempton, C. L. (2019) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105319842931 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Distress is Interdependent in Patients and Caregivers with Newly Diagnosed Incurable Cancers
Jacobs, J. M., Shaffer, K., Nipp, R., Fishbein, J., MacDonald, J., El-Jawahri, A., Pirl, W., Jackson, V., Park, E., Temel, J., et al. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9875-3 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Badger, T., Segrin, C., Hepworth, J., Pasvogel, A., Weihs, K., & Lopez, A. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3101 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Cui, P., Yang, M., Hu, H., Cheng, C., Chen, X., Shi, J., Li, S., Chen, C., & Zhang, H. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18321-3 · Cited by 118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“2,3 14 Given the high prevalence of distress, 5 anxiety, and depression 15 among patients and family caregivers, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer recommended that cancer programs should screen patients for distress and include family caregivers as stakeholders in cancer care.”
Kurtz, M. E., Kurtz, J. C., Given, C. W., & Given, B. A. (2005) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.02.008 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Randomized controlled trial of maintaining quality of life during radiotherapy for advanced cancer
Clark, M. M., Rummans, T. A., Atherton, P. J., Cheville, A. L., Johnson, M. E., Frost, M. H., Miller, J. J., Sloan, J. A., Graszer, K. M., Haas, J. G., et al. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.27776 · Cited by 115 · cited 1× · see citing works
“39,40, 110–”
Stanton, A. L., Luecken, L. J., MacKinnon, D. P., & Thompson, E. H. (2013) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028833 · Cited by 114 · cited 1× · see citing works
“121,122 In contrast, psy-choeducational NPIs are more informational, involving less active dialogue, whereas behavioral change and skills - based NPIs are usually prescriptive or focus on applied techniques.”
Badger, T. A., Segrin, C. G., Sikorskii, A. E., Pasvogel, A. E., Weihs, K. L., López, A. M., & Chalasani, P. (2019) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2019.1626395 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Mosher, C. E., Secinti, E., Hirsh, A. T., Hanna, N., Einhorn, L. H., Jalal, S. I., Durm, G., Champion, V. L., & Johns, S. A. (2019) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.06.021 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis
Chow, R., Mathews, J. J., Cheng, E. Y., Lo, S., Wong, J., Alam, S., Hannon, B., Rodin, G., Nissim, R., Hales, S., et al. (2023) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djad075 · Cited by 98 · cited 1× · see citing works
“17,18 25 Although the number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) has increased notably over the past 20 years, findings have been inconsistent because heterogeneity of NPIs, modes of delivery, and assessment time points.”
Ehlers, S. L., Davis, K., Bluethmann, S. M., Quintiliani, L. M., Kendall, J., Ratwani, R. M., Diefenbach, M. A., & Graves, K. D. (2019) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/iby123 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“16 However, resources to address distress, anxiety, and depression in patients with cancer and family caregivers are often inadequate, perpetuating adverse effects of the disease and its treatments 5 and increasing the estimated annual €199 billion global economic burden of cancer.”
Given, B. A., Given, C. W., Sikorskii, A. E., Jeon, S., Sherwood, P. R., & Rahbar, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.019 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The direct and indirect financial costs of informal cancer care: A scoping review
Coumoundouros, C., Ould Brahim, L., Lambert, S. D., & McCusker, J. (2019) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.12808 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Mosher, C. E., Winger, J. G., Hanna, N., Jalal, S. I., Einhorn, L. H., Birdas, T. J., Ceppa, D. P., Kesler, K. A., Schmitt, J., Kashy, D. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.006 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Milbury, K., Li, Y., Durrani, S., Liao, Z., Tsao, A. S., Carmack, C., Cohen, L., & Bruera, E. (2020) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0125 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Cancer caregiver quality of life: need for targeted intervention
Lapid, M. I., Atherton, P. J., Kung, S., Sloan, J. A., Shahi, V., Clark, M. M., & Rummans, T. A. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3960 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Price-Blackshear, M. A., Pratscher, S. D., Oyler, D. L., Armer, J. M., Cheng, A.-L., Cheng, M. X., Records, K., Udmuangpia, T., Carson, J. W., & Ann Bettencourt, B. (2020) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2020.1778150 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Reese, J. B., Smith, K. C., Handorf, E. A., Sorice, K. A., Bober, S. L., Bantug, E. T., Schwartz, S., & Porter, L. S. (2018) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2018.1510869 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Baucom, D. H., Olsen, M., Zafar, S. Y., & Uronis, H. (2017) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4121 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Milbury, K., Li, J., Weathers, S.-P. S., Mallaiah, S., Armstrong, T., Li, Y., Bruera, E. D., & Cohen, L. G. (2018) · Neuro-Oncology Practice · doi:10.1093/nop/npy052 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Donkor, A., Luckett, T., Aranda, S., & Phillips, J. (2018) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s00038-018-1142-2 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Kubo, A., Kurtovich, E., McGinnis, M., Aghaee, S., Altschuler, A., Quesenberry, C., Kolevska, T., Liu, R., Greyz‐Yusupov, N., & Avins, A. (2024) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5557 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self‐management intervention for head and neck cancer couples: Results of a randomized pilot trial
Badr, H., Herbert, K., Chhabria, K., Sandulache, V. C., Chiao, E. Y., & Wagner, T. (2019) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31906 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Six publications reporting outcomes from three different RCTs 38–43 were considered as single studies.”
Badger, T., Segrin, C., Pasvogel, A., & Lopez, A. (2013) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x13492289 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Mosher, C. E., Seçinti, E., Johns, S. A., O’Neil, B. H., Helft, P. R., Shahda, S., Jalal, S. I., & Champion, V. L. (2017) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1620-7 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Paley, C. A., Boland, J. W., Santarelli, M., Murtagh, F. E., Ziegler, L. E., & Chapman, E. (2023) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-023-01202-8 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Lambert, S., McElduff, P., Girgis, A., Levesque, J. V., Regan, T. W., Turner, J., Candler, H., Mihalopoulos, C., Shih, S. T. F., Kayser, K., et al. (2015) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2833-3 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Couper, J. W., Collins, A., Bloch, S., Street, A. F., Duchesne, G. M., Jones, T. M., Olver, J. S., & Love, A. W. (2015) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.12991 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Manne, S. L., Kashy, D. A., Zaider, T., Kissane, D. W., Lee, D. I., Kim, I. Y., Heckman, C. J., Penedo, F. J., Murphy, E., & Virtue, S. M. (2019) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12359 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dyadic Coping in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer and Their Spouses
Badr, H., Herbert, K., Bonnen, M. D., Asper, J. A., & Wagner, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01780 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“39,40, 110–”
Milbury, K., Liao, Z. X., Shannon, V. R., Mallaiah, S., Nagarathna, R., Li, Y., Yang, C. C., Carmack, C. L., Bruera, E. D., & Cohen, L. G. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4991 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Developing and Sustaining an Effective and Resilient Oncology Careforce: Opportunities for Action
Takvorian, S. U., Balogh, E. P., Nass, S. J., Valentin, V. L., Hoffman-Hōgg, L., Oyer, R. A., Carlson, R. W., Meropol, N. J., Sheldon, L. K., & Shulman, L. N. (2019) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djz239 · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in cancer care, especially in low - resource settings in the United States and parts of Europe and in low - income to middle - income countries, 127–133 caregivers should be formally recognized as part of the oncology workforce 134 and supported through hybrid, technology - assisted strategies.”
Arden-Close, E. J., Gidron, Y., Bayne, L., & Moss-Morris, R. E. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3280 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Walbaum, C., Philipp, R., Oechsle, K., Ullrich, A., & Vehling, S. (2023) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6239 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Molassiotis, A., Brown, T. E., Cheng, H., Byrnes, A., Chan, R. J., Wyld, D., Eastgate, M. A., Yates, P. M., Marshall, A. P., Fichera, R., et al. (2021) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-020-00657-2 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Manne, S. L., Siegel, S. D., Heckman, C. J., & Kashy, D. A. (2016) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000110 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Fergus, K. D., Ahmad, S., Gardner, S. L., Ianakieva, I., McLeod, D. L., Stephen, J. E., Carter, W., Periera, A., Warner, E., & Panchaud, J. (2021) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5836 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Hsiao, F.-H., Jow, G.-M., Kuo, W.-H., Yang, P.-S., Lam, H.-B., Chang, K.-J., Lee, J.-J., Huang, C.-S., Lai, Y.-M., Chen, Y.-T., et al. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0578-9 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Robertson, J. M., McNamee, P., Molloy, G. J., Hubbard, G., McNeill, A. S., Bollina, P. R., Kelly, D. M., & Forbat, L. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.013 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
McCaughan, E., Curran, C., Northouse, L., & Parahoo, K. (2018) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.008 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Xiu, D., Fung, Y. L., Lau, B. H. P., Wong, D. F. K., Chan, C., Ho, R., So, T., Lam, T., Lee, V. H.-F., Lee, A. W. M., et al. (2019) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04974-z · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial
Gremore, T. M., Brockstein, B., Porter, L. S., Brenner, S., Benfield, T., Baucom, D. H., Sher, T., & Atkins, D. C. (2020) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05848-5 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The Role of Family Caregivers in the Care of Older Adults with Cancer
Sun, V., Puts, M., Haase, K., Pilleron, S., Hannan, M., Sattar, S., & Strohschein, F. J. (2021) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151232 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Lambert, S., Duncan, L. R., Culos-Reed, S. N., Hallward, L., Higano, C. S., Loban, K., Katz, A., de Raad, M., Ellis, J., Korman, M. B., et al. (2022) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol29020067 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Kayser, K., Brydon, D. M., Moon, H., & Zebrack, B. (2020) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5488 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“126 A realistic approach regarding the resources required for NPI implementation would facilitate scaling up in routine practice.”
Griffin, J. M., Kaufman, B. G., Bangerter, L. R., et al. (2022) · Journal of Aging & Social Policy · doi:10.1080/08959420.2022.2029272 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Baucom, D. H., Hurwitz, H., Moser, B., Patterson, E., & Kim, H. J. (2012) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1272-z · Cited by 31 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Twelve studies (13 reports because of one pair of publications from the same RCT 42,43 ) lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs (e.g., re - randomization, multiple overlapping intervention arms) and were included only in the narrative synthesis (see Supporting Methods, Tables S1 and S2…”
Symptom distress and quality of life among Black Americans with cancer and their family caregivers
Ellis, K. R., Oh, S., Hecht, H. K., & Northouse, L. (2021) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5691 · Cited by 30 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Given the growing evidence regarding the interdependence of patient and caregiver well - being 110–112 and caregivers' central role in cancer care, especially in low - resource settings in the United States and parts of Europe and in low - income to middle - income countries, 127–133 caregivers…”
Effectiveness of stepped care for mental health disorders: An umbrella review of meta-analyses
Jeitani, A., Fahey, P. P., Gascoigne, M., Darnal, A., & Lim, D. (2024) · Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100140 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“137 Such models, already successful in other chronic conditions, 138 adjust support dynamically based on need and timing and are well suited to dyadic care, in which patient and caregiver needs may diverge over time.”
Effects of an Education Program on Radiation Oncology Patients and Families
Hoff, A. C., & Haaga, D. A. F. (2005) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1300/j077v23n04_04 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Pang, X., Jin, Y., & Wang, H. (2022) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100104 · Cited by 29 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Northouse et al. 19 did not find any effect of NPIs on caregiver depression, a finding that was confirmed by Pang et al. 21 The meta - analyses by Pang et al. 21 and Dhumal et al. 9 did not report the timeframe for assessing NPI effects, which may partially explain these inconsistencies.”
Decadt, I., Laenen, A., Celus, J., Geyskens, S., Vansteenlandt, H., & Coolbrandt, A. (2021) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.13399 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Porter, L. S., Steel, J. L., Fairclough, D. L., LeBlanc, T. W., Bull, J., Hanson, L. C., Fischer, S., & Keefe, F. J. (2021) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163211004216 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ownsworth, T., Chambers, S. K., Jones, S., Parker, G. J., Aitken, J. F., Foote, M. C., Gordon, L. G., Shum, D., Robertson, J., Conlon, E. G., et al. (2023) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6189 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Dhumal, T., Siddiqui, Z. A., Kelley, G. A., Harper, F., & Kelly, K. M. (2023) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100145 · Cited by 25 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Northouse et al. 19 did not find any effect of NPIs on caregiver depression, a finding that was confirmed by Pang et al. 21 The meta - analyses by Pang et al. 21 and Dhumal et al. 9 did not report the timeframe for assessing NPI effects, which may partially explain these inconsistencies.”
Salikhanov, I., Katapodi, M., Kunirova, G., & Crape, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186107 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in cancer care, especially in low - resource settings in the United States and parts of Europe and in low - income to middle - income countries, 127–133 caregivers should be formally recognized as part of the oncology workforce 134 and supported through hybrid, technology - assisted strategies.”
Self-citationTrevino, K. M., Stern, A., Hershkowitz, R., Kim, S. Y., Li, Y., Lachs, M., & Prigerson, H. G. (2021) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951521000286 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Chen, M., Gong, J., Zhou, J., Chen, X., Zhao, J., Lin, C., & Li, Q. (2024) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102565 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Mosher, C. E., Beck-Coon, K. A., Wu, W., Lewson, A. B., Stutz, P. V., Brown, L. F., Tang, Q., Helft, P. R., Levoy, K., Hickman, S. E., et al. (2024) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-024-01564-7 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Li, Y., Li, L., & Pan, Z. (2019) · Integrative Cancer Therapies · doi:10.1177/1534735419842373 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Koizumi, T., Sugishita, Y., Suzuki‐Takahashi, Y., Nara, K., Miyagawa, T., Nakajima, M., Sugimoto, K., Futamura, M., Furui, T., Takai, Y., et al. (2023) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.34796 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Milbury, K., Whisenant, M., Weathers, S.-P. S., et al. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.5514 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Marshall, C., Virdun, C., & Phillips, J. L. (2024) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163241269796 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Wang, N., Wang, K., Lu, X., Zhang, S., Sun, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28593 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Karlsen, R. V., Bidstrup, P. E., Giraldi, A. G. E., Hvarness, H., Bagi, P., Lauridsen, S. V., Albieri, V., Frederiksen, M., Krause, E. G., Due, U., et al. (2021) · Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100350 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Zhou, J., Wang, Z., Chen, X., Lin, C., Zhao, J., Loke, A. Y., & Li, Q. (2024) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12734 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Smith, A. B., Girgis, A., Taylor, N. J., Pearce, A. M., Liu, J., Shepherd, H. L., Wu, V. S., Garvey, G., Kirsten, L. T., Zakhary, I., et al. (2024) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-024-01685-1 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“139,140 In summary, structured NPIs can provide short - term benefits for patients with cancer and modest effects for family caregivers.”
Symptom burden and quality of life among patient and family caregiver dyads in advanced cancer
Ellis, K. R., Furgal, A. K. C., Odunitan-Wayas, F. A., Contreras, A., Jones, C. R., Perez, S. S., Raji, D., Smith, M., Vincent, C., Song, L., et al. (2024) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-024-03743-8 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationAmmari, A. B. H., Hendriksen, C., & Rydahl‐Hansen, S. (2018) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2018.1460003 · Cited by 16 · cited 1× · see citing works
“44–”
Shohdy, K., Abdel-Malek, R., Farag, D., & Cox, S. (2019) · Indian Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_199_18 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in cancer care, especially in low - resource settings in the United States and parts of Europe and in low - income to middle - income countries, 127–133 caregivers should be formally recognized as part of the oncology workforce 134 and supported through hybrid, technology - assisted strategies.”
Xu, S., Tan, X. M., Ma, C., McElyea, R. S., Shieh, K., Stover, A. M., Smith, A. B., Stitzenberg, K. B., Basch, E., & Song, L. (2023) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-023-10919-x · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationBurstein, R., Aviv, A., Even‐Zohar, N. G., et al. (2023) · European Journal Of Haematology · doi:10.1111/ejh.14035 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“29 No other restrictions were applied.”
Roddy, M. K., Pfammatter, A. F., & Mayberry, L. (2023) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2023.618 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Pozzar, R. A., Enzinger, A. C., Howard, C., Tavormina, A., Matulonis, U. A., Campos, S., Liu, J. F., Horowitz, N., Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Krasner, C. N., et al. (2024) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.001 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Sun, L., Xiao, H., Zheng, J., & Lin, X. (2022) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163211066736 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Carr, A. L., Bilenduke, E., Adolf, E., Kessler, E. R., Arch, J. J., Ranby, K. W., & Kilbourn, K. M. (2023) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951523000196 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“139,140 In summary, structured NPIs can provide short - term benefits for patients with cancer and modest effects for family caregivers.”
Reese, J. B., Lepore, S. J., Sorice, K. A., Zimmaro, L. A., Hasler, J., Handorf, E. A., Daly, M. B., Zaleta, A. K., Westbrook, K. E., & Porter, L. S. (2024) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35685 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Patient-caregiver relationship in cancer fatigue and distress. A dyadic approach
Taurisano, P., De Feudis, R. L., Graziano, G., Marzano, N., Curci, A., Fidanzio, A., Annunziata, M. A., Antinone, V., Brovelli, S., Carone, M., et al. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03860-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Lei, F., Lee, E., Shin, J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282887 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“117,123 Cancer types and stages”
Wang, Z., Chen, X., Zhou, J., Lin, C., Luo, H., & Li, Q. (2023) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2884 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Xiao, Y., Sun, J., Liu, M., Wang, H., & Guan, J. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-02769-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Examining Caregiver Outcomes in the CONNECT Intervention for Patients With Advanced Cancer
Semere, W., Althouse, A. D., Arnold, R. M., White, D. B., Smith, T. J., Chu, E., Rosenzweig, M. Q., & Schenker, Y. (2022) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.025 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Jin, Y., Li, X., Ma, H., Xiong, L., Zhao, M., & Wang, H. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100580 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Chen, X., Zhou, J., Lin, C., Zhao, J., & Li, Q. (2024) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6326 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kim, M., Tan, K. R., & Coombs, L. A. (2024) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.9301 · Cited by 9 · cited 2× · see citing works
“117,123 Cancer types and stages”
Milbury, K., Ann‐Yi, S., Whisenant, M., Jones, M., Li, Y., Necroto, V., Yousuf, S., Chávez‐MacGregor, M., Meyers, L., & Bruera, E. D. (2024) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyae351 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Chen, M., Cao, Q., Gong, J., Zhao, J., Lin, C., Luo, H., Wu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, Q. (2023) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2919 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Badger, T. A., Segrin, C., Crane, T. E., Chalasani, P., Arslan, W., Hadeed, M., Given, C. W., & Sikorskii, A. E. (2024) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-024-08734-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gong, J., Chen, M., Luo, H., & Li, Q. (2024) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102737 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sterba, K. R., Armeson, K. E., Zapka, J. G., Garrett-Mayer, E. S., Scallion, M. L., Wall, T. K., Olsen, J., Graboyes, E. M., Alberg, A. J., & Day, T. A. (2022) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-022-01227-7 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Lambert, S., Moodie, E. E. M., McCusker, J., Lokhorst, M., Harris, C. A., Langmuir, T., Belzile, É., Laizner, A. M., Brahim, L. O., Wasserman, S., et al. (2025) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.70043 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Breivik, E., Ervik, B., & Kitzmüller, G. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11875-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Qdaisat, A., Stroh, E., Reyes-Gibby, C., Wattana, M. K., Viets-Upchurch, J., Li, Z., Page, V. D., Fatima, H., Chaftari, P., & Elsayem, A. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16233988 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Shi, X., Zhang, H., Li, G., & Wang, Q. (2024) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151752 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Goshe, B., Barata, A., Finkelstein‐Fox, L., Cloutier, J. G., Farnam, E., Holmbeck, K. E., Waldron, E. M., Perez, G. K., Malloy, L., Miranda, I., et al. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101506 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“137 Such models, already successful in other chronic conditions, 138 adjust support dynamically based on need and timing and are well suited to dyadic care, in which patient and caregiver needs may diverge over time.”
Badger, T., Segrin, C., Crane, T. E., Chalasani, P., Arslan, W., Hadeed, M., Cunicelli, N., Given, C. W., & Sikorskii, A. (2026) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-024-01723-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Dyadische Planungsintervention nach Prostatektomie
Burkert, S., & Knoll, N. (2012) · Psychotherapeut · doi:10.1007/s00278-012-0910-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ferlay J, Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today
- Ross CE, 2003, Social Causes of Psychological Distress
- Higgins JPT, 2024, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.5
- Lipsey MW, 2001, Practical Meta‐Analysis
- BioStat, Inc, 2022, Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis, Version 4
- Schünemann H, 2013, GRADE handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach
- National Cancer Institute; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, 2025, SEER*Explorer: An interactive website for SEER cancer statistics
- Authors
- Schiess, L. C., Song, L. L., Schädelin, S., Fürst, T., Urech, C., Friese, C. R., & Katapodi, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- University Hospital of Basel (CH)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Katapodi, Maria C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e70076-e70076
- ISSN
- 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-4863
- PMC
- PMC13078667
- OpenAlex
- W7154404923
- Semantic Scholar
- cea3396212a7fe10c5c12f31169c11980034e0cc
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universität Basel
- University of Texas at San Antonio
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Keywords
- non-pharmacological treatment, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, cancer patients, family caregivers, solid tumors, psychoeducation, therapeutic counseling, skills training, behavior modification, outpatient oncology
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Distress, Adult, Anxiety, Counseling, Depression, Humans, Neoplasms, Stress, Psychological, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review