Cited by 43Cardiac Health and Mental HealthTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effects of escitalopram in prevention of depression in patients with acute coronary syndrome (DECARD)

Hansen, Baiba Hedegaard, Hanash, Jamal Abed, Rasmussen, Alice, Hansen, Jørgen Fischer, Andersen, Nadia Lyhne Trærup, Nielsen, Olav Wendelboe, Birket-Smith, Morten·2012·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective Depression is a major problem in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with negative impact on survival and quality of life. No studies have examined prevention of post-ACS depression. We examined whether treatment with escitalopram can prevent post-ACS depression. Methods We have conducted a randomised controlled trial. Between November 2004 and December 2007, 240 patients in 2 university hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark, with ACS were randomised. Patients were randomised to a double-blind treatment with escitalopram or matching placebo for 1 year. Main outcome measure was the incidence of ICD-10 depressive episode. Results Of 120 patients treated with escitalopram 2 developed depression versus 10 in placebo treated group (log rank, p=0.022). In multivariate analysis treatment with placebo and high Hamilton Depression Scale score at baseline were associated with development of depression. Patients were well matched at baseline. Conclusion Twelve months treatment with escitalopram prevented depression in post-ACS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.07.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, B. H., Hanash, J. A., Rasmussen, A., Hansen, J. F., Andersen, N. L. T., Nielsen, O. W., & Birket-Smith, M.
Affiliations
Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Hansen, Baiba Hedegaard
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
11-16
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014843652
Cited by
43
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Danish Hearts Foundation (01-1-9-F13-22884)
  • Danish Medical Research Council (22-02-0221)
  • H. Lundbeck Ltd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
escitalopram, depression prevention, acute coronary syndrome, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressant prophylaxis, baseline depression severity
MeSH terms
Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Citalopram, Treatment Outcome, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review