Cited by 58Primary Care and Health OutcomesChronic Disease Management StrategiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Why do they keep coming back? Psychosocial etiology of persistence of frequent attendance in primary care: A prospective cohort study

Smits, Frans T, Brouwer, Henk J, Zwinderman, Aeilko H, Mohrs, Jacob, Schene, Aart H, van Weert, Henk C P M, ter Riet, Gerben·2014·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Background Patients who visit their General Practitioner (GP) very frequently over extended periods of time often have multimorbidity and are costly in primary and specialist healthcare. We investigated the impact of patient-level psychosocial and GP-level factors on the persistence of frequent attendance (FA) in primary care. Methods Two-year prospective cohort study in 623 incident adult frequent attenders (>90th attendance centile; age and sex-adjusted) in 2009. Information was collected through questionnaires (patients, GPs) and GPs' patient data. We used multilevel, ordinal logistic regression analysis, controlling for somatic illness and demographic factors with FA in 2010 and/or 2011 as the outcome. Results Other anxiety (odds ratio (OR) 2.00; 95% confidence interval from 1.29 to 3.10) over 3years and the number of life events in 3years (OR 1.06; 1.01-1.10 per event; range of 0 to 12) and, at baseline, panic disorder (OR 5.40; 1.67-17.48), other anxiety (OR 2.78; 1.04-7.46), illness behavior (OR 1.13; 1.05-1.20 per point; 28-point scale) and lack of mastery (OR 1.08; 1.01-1.15 per point; 28-point scale) were associated with persistence of FA. We found no evidence of synergistic effects of somatic, psychological and social problems. We found no strong evidence of effects of GP characteristics. Conclusion Panic disorder, other anxiety, negative life events, illness behavior and lack of mastery are independently associated with persistence of frequent attendance. Effectiv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.003

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results are representative of FAs in general.

    “Although only a low proportion of FAs and NAs responded to the study, there is enough similarity with anonymized record-based studies involving other varied practice samples ( 6 , 8 , 9 , 23 , 24 ) to believe that our results are representative of FAs in general.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smits, F. T., Brouwer, H. J., Zwinderman, A. H., Mohrs, J., Schene, A. H., van Weert, H. C. P. M., & ter Riet, G.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Smits, Frans T
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
492-503
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051533635
Cited by
58
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
frequent attenders, primary care, psychosocial factors, anxiety, panic disorder, life events, illness behavior, mastery, health care utilization, multimorbidity, health care costs
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review