Cited by 303Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A validation study of the Whitely Index, the Illness Attitude Scales, and the Somatosensory Amplification Scale in general medical and general practice patients

Speckens, Anne E.M., Spinhoven, Philip, Sloekers, Peter P.A., Bolk, Jan H., van Hemert, Albert M.·1996·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Whitely Index (WI), the Illness Attitude Scales (IAS), and the Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SAS). The study population consisted of 130 general medical outpatients, 113 general practice patients, and 204 subjects from the general population. The factorial structure of the IAS appeared to consist of two subscales, namely Health Anxiety and Illness Behaviour. The internal consistency and stability of the three questionnaires were satisfactory, and their scores were highly intercorrelated. Scores on the WI and Health Anxiety subscale of the IAS declined significantly from general medical outpatients, through general practice patients to subjects from the general population. This might imply that medical care utilisation is related to hypochondriasis. A prospective study is needed to determine whether health anxiety contributes to the decision to seek medical care or the consultation of a general practitioner or consultant gives rise to worry about possible illness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00561-7

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ten Berghe, 1990, Simultaneous Components Analysis in two or more populations (in Dutch), Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 45, 221

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Speckens, A. E. M., Spinhoven, P., Sloekers, P. P. A., Bolk, J. H., & van Hemert, A. M.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Speckens, Anne E.M.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
95-104
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028552158
Cited by
303
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
health anxiety, illness behavior, questionnaire validation, reliability statistics, general practice patients, psychosomatic symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Family Practice, Female, Health Services, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review