Cited by 19Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychometric properties of the Somatic Symptom Scale 8 (SSS-8) in a representative sample of German adolescents

Open access
Kliem, Sören, Krieg, Yvonne, Beller, Johannes, Brähler, Elmar, Baier, Dirk·2021·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective The psychometric properties of the Somatic Symptom Scale 8 (SSS-8) have been investigated in different studies. However, there is no study examining its psychometric properties on representative data of adolescents. The study at hand will present results from a large representative sample of German adolescents (13 to 18 years).Methods The following analyses draw on cross-sectional data from German ninth-grade students collected in 2015. Altogether, 10,638 individuals were surveyed with a return rate of 68.5% as part of a periodic representative survey in the German federal state of Lower Saxony.Results For the SSS-8, coefficient omega for the full sample was ω = 0.90, and ω = 0.77 and 0.79 for males and females, respectively. In addition, a convergent validity was determined with the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 (PHQ-2), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2 (GAD-2), and the brief form of Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (FSozU-K6). Based on a confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance analysis (for gender and migration background), the initially determined factor structure by Gierk et al. of the SSS-8 could be confirmed.Conclusion The results support the reliability and validity of the SSS-8 for use with adolescents. The use of the SSS-8 seems to be meaningful within different frameworks, especially when, due to a lack of time or for reasons of cost, no face-to-face interviews can be conducted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110593

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kliem, S., Krieg, Y., Beller, J., Brähler, E., & Baier, D.
Affiliations
  • Ernst Abbe University of Applied Sciences Jena (DE)
  • Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Corresponding author
Kliem, Sören
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
149
Pages
110593
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190759556
Cited by
19
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ZHAW Digital Collection (cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
somatic symptoms, adolescents, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, convergent validity, measurement invariance, gender differences, migration background, factor structure, German adolescents
MeSH terms
Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Patient Health Questionnaire, Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review