Does early child care affect children's development?
Open accessAbstract
We study how early child care (ECC) affects children's development in a marginal treatment effect framework that allows for rich forms of observed and unobserved effect heterogeneity. Exploiting a reform in Germany that induced school districts to expand ECC at different points in time, we find strong but diverging effects on children's motor and socio-emotional skills. Children who were most likely to attend ECC benefit in terms of their motor skill development. Children who were least likely to attend ECC gain in terms of their socio-emotional skill development, especially boys and children from disadvantaged families, such as those with low education or migration backgrounds. Simulating expansions of ECC, we find that a moderate expansion fosters motor skills for all children and language skills for boys and immigrant children. A progressive expansion of ECC improves all children's socio-emotional development but neither their motor skills nor their language skills.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most carefully designed studies show that the provision of early childcare is beneficial, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
“though most carefully designed studies show that the provision of early childcare is beneficial, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds (Havnes and Mogstad 2015, Cornelissen et al. 2018, Felfe and Lalive 2018, Gormley and Gayer 2005).”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Felfe and Lalive 2018
Cites
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note
Goodman, R. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · Cited by 14,908 · see citing works
Estimating Marginal Returns to Education
Carneiro, P., Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.6.2754 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Who benefits from universal child care? Estimating marginal returns to early child care attendance
Cornelissen, T., Dustmann, C., Raute, A., & Schönberg, U. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/699979 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Who benefits from universal child care? Estimating marginal returns to early child care attendance
Cornelissen, T., Dustmann, C., Raute, A., & Schönberg, U. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/699979 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“, 2018; Felfe and Lalive, 2018; Gormley and Gayer, 2005; Havnes and Mogstad, 2015). This is in line with what might be expected, as the level of alternative investment received by children of poorer, less-educated, and immigrant backgrounds is likely to be lower. A few programs, for example, $5-a-day childcare in Queb…”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Felfe, C., & Lalive, R.
- Affiliations
- University of St.Gallen (CH)
- Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lalive, Rafael
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 159
- Pages
- 33-53
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794134803
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 62.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Swiss National Science Foundation (51NF40-160590)
- Swiss National ScienceFoundation
- University of St. Gallen
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Keywords
- early childhood care, child development, motor skills, socioemotional skills, language skills, heterogeneous effects, school district reform, immigrant children, disadvantaged families, gender differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review