The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
We consider several economic uncertainty indicators for the US and UK before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: implied stock market volatility, newspaper-based policy uncertainty, Twitter chatter about economic uncertainty, subjective uncertainty about business growth, forecaster disagreement about future GDP growth, and a model-based measure of macro uncertainty. Four results emerge. First, all indicators show huge uncertainty jumps in reaction to the pandemic and its economic fallout. Indeed, most indicators reach their highest values on record. Second, peak amplitudes differ greatly – from a 35% rise for the model-based measure of US economic uncertainty (relative to January 2020) to a 20-fold rise in forecaster disagreement about UK growth. Third, time paths also differ: Implied volatility rose rapidly from late February, peaked in mid-March, and fell back by late March as stock prices began to recover. In contrast, broader measures of uncertainty peaked later and then plateaued, as job losses mounted, highlighting differences between Wall Street and Main Street uncertainty measures. Fourth, in Cholesky-identified VAR models fit to monthly U.S. data, a COVID-size uncertainty shock foreshadows peak drops in industrial production of 12–19%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li, R., Pei, S., Chen, B., Song, Y., Zhang, T., Yang, W., & Shaman, J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb3221 · Cited by 3,633
Cited by
A literature review of the economics of COVID-19
Brodeur, A., Gray, D., Islam, A., & Bhuiyan, S. (2021) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12423 · Cited by 976
“Based on a similar approach, Altig et al. (2020) conduct an analysis of different forward-looking uncertainty measures during the pandemic. Coibion et al. (2020a) use surveys to assess the macroeconomic expectations of households in the United States. They find that it is primarily lockdowns, rather than the infection…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJob search during the COVID-19 crisis
Hensvik, L., Le Barbanchon, T., & Rathelot, R. (2021) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104349 · Cited by 144
Altay, S., Kleis Nielsen, R., & Fletcher, R. (2022) · Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2022.020 · Cited by 88
Sustainability Preferences Under Stress: Evidence from COVID-19
Döttling, R., & Kim, S. (2020) · SSRN Working Paper · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3656756 · Cited by 161
Baerg, L., & Bruchmann, K. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103534 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Altig, D., Baker, S., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., Davis, S. J., Leather, J., Meyer, B., Mihaylov, E., Mizen, P., Parker, N., Renault, T., Smietanka, P., & Thwaites, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 104274
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036400444
- Cited by
- 987
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 144.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104274
- The paper
- Altig, D., Baker, S., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., Davis, S. J., Leather, J., Meyer, B., Mihaylov, E., Mizen, P., Parker, N., Renault, T., Smietanka, P., & Thwaites, G. (2020). Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.