Cited by 46COVID-19 and Mental HealthCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactMisinformation and Its Impacts

COVID-19 information overload: Intolerance of uncertainty moderates the relationship between frequency of internet searching and fear of COVID-19

Open access
Baerg, Lindsay, Bruchmann, Kathryn·2022·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented levels of uncertainty for people around the world. Research suggests that internet searching resulting in contradictory information can lead to increased levels of distress, particularly for people who have a high intolerance of uncertainty (IU). In the present correlational study, U.S. undergraduate students (N = 317) indicated their IU, the frequency with which they search for COVID-19 related information online, their overall health anxiety, their fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19), and engagement in prevention behaviors. Consistent with previous research, individual differences in IU moderated the relationship between internet searches and FCV-19 such that for people high in IU, more internet searching was associated with greater fear. In turn, we also found that greater FCV-19 predicted more social-distancing behaviors. These findings are important in both future mental health and public health initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103534

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with higher IU who frequently searched the internet for COVID-19 information experienced greater fear of the virus; this fear is both a consequence and a driver of IU.

    “Research shows that individuals with higher IU who frequently searched the internet for COVID-19 information experienced greater fear of the virus—a fear that is both a consequence and a driver of IU [95].”

    From Impact of Media-Induced Uncertainty on Mental Health: Narrative-Based Perspective. (2025) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Results (Primary analyses) report that more frequent COVID-19 internet searching was associated with greater fear, particularly among participants high in IU. The Fear of COVID-19 section suggests that fear can both result from and lead to IU, but the citing sentence presents that tentative, bidirectional interpretation as established fact. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Abramowitz J.S. Braddock A.E. Psychological treatments of health anxiety and hypochondriasis: A biopsychosocial approach 2008 Hogrefe & Huber Cambridge, MA
  2. Warwick H.M. Salkovskis P.M. Hypochondriasis: An acceptable diagnosis- reassurance British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Education) 290 6474 1985 1028 PMC1418321 3921095

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baerg, L., & Bruchmann, K.
Affiliations
Santa Clara University (US)
Corresponding author
Baerg, Lindsay
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
224
Pages
103534
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213159969
Cited by
46
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Santa Clara University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, intolerance of uncertainty, web search, fear of COVID-19, information overload, health anxiety, preventive behavior, social distancing, moderating effect, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Fear, Humans, Internet, Uncertainty, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review