Cited by 35Urological Disorders and TreatmentsGenital Health and DiseaseSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Penile length nomogram for Asian Indian prepubertal boys

Teckchandani, Narinder, Bajpai, Minu·2014·Journal of Pediatric Urology

Abstract

Background Penile length-for-age nomograms in prepubertal boys may aid in early recognition of endocrine and genetic disorders associated with abnormal phallic size. There are scarce data on the penile length measurements in children beyond the neonatal period and there is a lack of such a nomogram for Asian Indians. Materials and methods Of the boys who were admitted in our ward or seen in the outpatient setting for genitalia-unrelated surgical problems, 20 consecutive boys were included in each of the following ten age slots (total of 200 subjects): 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-7, 7-8, 8-9, and 9-10 years. Their stretched penile length (SPL) measurements were used to establish the normal range (mean ± 2 SD) of penile length-for-age in prepubertal Indian boys. Mean ± 2.5 SD was also calculated to define the cut-offs for micropenis and macropenis, respectively, in each age group. Results A rapid increase is seen in penile length up to 4 years of age. A much slower increase is implied thereafter. Conclusion This study provides reference values of penile lengths for Asian Indian boys aged 0-10 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.017

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In neighboring India, many studies have been conducted to establish local nomograms for pediatric male external genitalia, some representing statewise populations.

    “Pakistan lacks the sufficient reference data for this purpose, while on the other hand, in neighboring India, which shares close ethnic proximity, many studies have been conducted only for this sole purpose, some of which represent the statewise population highlighting the importance of locally derived nomograms [8, 15-19].”
  • The study required a total sample size of 770 with at least 43 boys in each age group to achieve a power of 0.8, based on the standard deviation of seven previously published studies.

    “As per the standard deviation of seven[4] previously published studies, for the power of study to be 0.8, total sample size required was 770 with n > = 43 in each age group.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teckchandani, N., & Bajpai, M.
Affiliations
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Bajpai, Minu
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
352-354
ISSN
1477-5131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055685520
Cited by
35
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
penile length, stretched penile length, nomogram, prepubertal boys, reference values, micropenis, age-related growth
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Genital Diseases, Male, Humans, India, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Penis, Reference Values, Cohort Studies, Asian People, Nomograms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review