The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hilken, T., de Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0541-x · Cited by 693
Using transformational appeals to enhance the retail experience
NAYLOR, G., KLEISER, S., BAKER, J., & YORKSTON, E. (2008) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.01.001 · Cited by 102
Touching tastes: The haptic perception transfer of liquid food packaging materials
Tu, Y., Yang, Z., & Ma, C. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.001 · Cited by 71
Marketing analytics using anonymized and fragmented tracking data
Kakatkar, C., & Spann, M. (2019) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.10.001 · Cited by 59
Exploring the role of augmented reality in purchase intention: Through flow and immersive experience
Pathak, K., & Prakash, G. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122833 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Grohmann, B., Spangenberg, E. R., & Sprott, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Retailing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-245
- ISSN
- 0022-4359 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106321664
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.