Cited by 102Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Using transformational appeals to enhance the retail experience

NAYLOR, G, KLEISER, S, BAKER, J, YORKSTON, E·2008·Journal of Retailing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NAYLOR, G., KLEISER, S., BAKER, J., & YORKSTON, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • Texas Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
NAYLOR, G
Venue
Journal of Retailing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
49-57
ISSN
0022-4359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964752998
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
retail experience, advertising appeals, informational appeals, hedonic benefits, symbolic benefits, functional benefits, customer experience, retail marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review