Cited by 76Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationAI in Service Interactions

Examining the antecedents of trust and rapport in services: Discovering new interrelationships

Macintosh, Gerrard·2009·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.02.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 76

Authors
Macintosh, G.
Affiliations
North Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
Macintosh, Gerrard
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
298-305
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034690823
Cited by
76
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
consumer trust, rapport, service encounters, expertise, dependability, familiarity, antecedents of trust, service providers, customer-provider relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review