CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 83Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsFood Waste Reduction and Sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unclarity confusion and expiration date labels in the United States: A consumer perspective

Hall-Phillips, Adrienne, Shah, Purvi·2017·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Agarwal, 2005, An integrated model of attitude and affect: theoretical foundation and an empirical investigation, J. Bus. Res., 58, 483, 10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00138-3 · DOI
  2. Arnold, 1994, Hermeneutics and consumer research, J. Consum. Res., 21, 55, 10.1086/209382 · DOI
  3. Block, 2011, From nutrients to nurturance: a conceptual introduction to food well-being, J. Public Policy Mark., 30, 5, 10.1509/jppm.30.1.5 · DOI
  4. Casini, 2008, Trends in the British wine market and consumer confusion, Br. Food J., 110, 545, 10.1108/00070700810877870 · DOI
  5. Dhar, 1997, Consumer preference for a no-choice option, J. Consum. Res., 24, 215, 10.1086/209506 · DOI
  6. Drummond, 2004, Consumer confusion: reduction strategies in higher education, Int. J. Educ. Manag., 18, 317, 10.1108/09513540410543466 · DOI
  7. Drummond, 2005, Consumer confusion in the UK wine industry, J. Wine Res., 16, 55, 10.1080/09571260500236633 · DOI
  8. Fortin, 2009, Consumer attitudes toward freshness indicators on perishable food products, J. Food Distrib. Res., 40, 1
  9. Fournier, 1998, Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research, J. Consum. Res., 24, 343, 10.1086/209515 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Foxall, 1993, A behaviourist perspective on purchase and consumption, Eur. J. Mark., 27, 7, 10.1108/03090569310042891 · DOI
  11. Foxman, 1990, An investigation of factors contributing to consumer brand confusion, J. Consum. Aff., 24, 170, 10.1111/j.1745-6606.1990.tb00264.x · DOI
  12. Foxman, 1992, Consumer brand confusion: a conceptual framework, Psychol. Mark., 9, 123, 10.1002/mar.4220090204 · DOI
  13. Gruber, 2016, What a waste! Exploring the human reality of food waste from the store manager’s perspective, J. Public Policy Mark., 35, 3, 10.1509/jppm.14.095 · DOI
  14. Guba, 1981, Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Educ. Commun. Technol. J., 29, 75, 10.1007/BF02766777 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Guo, 2009, A study of cross-border outshopping determinants: mediating effect of outshopping enjoyment, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 33, 644, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00811.x · DOI
  16. Harcar, 2005, A cross‐cultural exploration of attitudes toward product expiration dates, Psychol. Mark., 22, 353, 10.1002/mar.20063 · DOI
  17. Homburg, 2006, The role of cognition and affect in the formation of customer satisfaction: a dynamic perspective, J. Mark., 70, 21, 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.21 · DOI
  18. Huffman, 1998, Variety for sale: mass customization or Mass confusion?, J. Retail., 74, 491, 10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80105-5 · DOI
  19. Jacoby, 1989, The comprehension/miscomprehension of print communication: selected findings, J. Consum. Res., 15, 434, 10.1086/209183 · DOI
  20. Jacoby, 1998, Not manufactured or authorized by: recent federal cases involving trademark disclaimers, J. Public Policy Mark., 17, 97, 10.1177/074391569801700110 · DOI
  21. Lavidge, 1961, A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness, J. Mark., 25, 59, 10.2307/1248516 · DOI
  22. Leek, 2006, Consumer confusion in the Chinese personal computer market, J. Prod. Brand Manag., 15, 184, 10.1108/10610420610668621 · DOI
  23. Leek, 2006, Consumer confusion in the Thai mobile phone market, J. Consum. Behav., 5, 518, 10.1002/cb.200 · DOI
  24. Leib, 2013, The dating game: How confusing food date labels lead to food waste in America, Nat. Resour. Def. Counc.
  25. Levy, 1981, Intepreting consumer mythology: a structural approach to consumer behavior, J. Mark., 45, 49, 10.2307/1251541 · DOI
  26. Mick, 1992, A meaning-based model of advertising experiences, J. Consum. Res., 19, 317, 10.1086/209305 · DOI
  27. Miranda, 2006, Promoting brands of perishable items on the promise of generous availability of consumption time, J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark., 14, 238, 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740184 · DOI
  28. Mitchell, 1998, A role for consumer risk perceptions in grocery retailing, Br. Food J., 100, 171, 10.1108/00070709810207856 · DOI
  29. Mitchell, 1997, Exploring consumer confusion in the watch market, Mark. Intell. Plan., 15, 164, 10.1108/02634509710185270 · DOI
  30. Mitchell, 1999, Marketing causes and implications of consumer confusion, J. Prod. Brand Manag., 8, 319, 10.1108/10610429910284300 · DOI
  31. Nord, 1980, A behavior modification perspective on marketing, J. Mark., 44, 36, 10.2307/1249975 · DOI
  32. Pluzinski, 1986, Conusmer response to marketing stimuli: the relationship between affect, cognition, and behavior, Adv. Consum. Res., 13, 231
  33. Rotfeld, 2009, Health information consumers can’t or don’t want to use, J. Consum. Aff., 43, 373, 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01145.x · DOI
  34. Schouten, 1991, Selves in transition: symbolic consumption in personal rites of passage and identity reconstruction, J. Consum. Res., 17, 412, 10.1086/208567 · DOI
  35. Sen, 2009, Why my mother never threw anything out: the effect of product freshness on consumption, J. Consum. Res., 36, 47, 10.1086/596027 · DOI
  36. Shah, 2017, Antecedents and implications of expiration date search effort, J. Consum. Aff.,, 10.1111/joca.12141 · DOI
  37. Spiteri Cornish, 2015, The impact of consumer confusion on nutrition literacy and subsequent dietary behavior, Psychol. Mark., 32, 558, 10.1002/mar.20800 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Thompson, 1996, Caring consumers: gendered consumption meanings and the juggling lifestyle, J. Consum. Res., 22, 388, 10.1086/209457 · DOI
  39. Tsiros, 2005, The effect of expiration dates and perceived risk on purchasing behavior in grocery store perishable categories, J. Mark., 69, 114, 10.1509/jmkg.69.2.114.60762 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Turnbull, 2000, Customer confusion: the mobile phone market, J. Mark. Manag., 16, 143, 10.1362/026725700785100523 · DOI
  41. Walsh, 2010, The effect of consumer confusion proneness on word of mouth, trust, and customer satisfaction, Eur. J. Mark., 44, 838, 10.1108/03090561011032739 · DOI
  42. Wansink, 2006, Best if used by.. How freshness dating influences food acceptance, J. Food Sci., 71, S354, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00011.x · DOI
  43. Yeung, 2001, Food safety risk: consumer perception and purchase behaviour, Br. Food J., 103, 170, 10.1108/00070700110386728 · DOI
  44. Zajonc, 1982, Affective and cognitive factors in preferences, J. Consum. Res., 9, 123, 10.1086/208905 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hall-Phillips, A., & Shah, P.
Affiliations
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
ORCID
Shah, Purvi
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
35
Pages
118-126
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.007
OpenAlex
W2562683261
Cited by
83
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Keywords
expiration date, purchase decision, label format, consumer behavior, cognitive effects, affective consequences, path to purchase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review