Cited by 53Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive System and PregnancyPregnancy-related medical research

Preeclampsia: a view through the danger model

Open access
Bonney, Elizabeth A.·2007·Journal of Reproductive Immunology

Abstract

Classical thinking suggests that the immune system undergoes activation on the basis of discrimination between 'self' and 'non-self'. Accordingly, the fetus activates the mother's immune system because the fetus is in part 'non-self'. Thus, successful pregnancy depends on constraint of maternal immunity. Preeclampsia is an outcome of lost constraint. Instead, the danger model suggests that normal pregnancy, regardless of the expression of 'non-self' antigens, does not activate the maternal immune system unless that pregnancy expresses danger signals. Thus, preeclampsia stems from stress or abnormal cell death in pregnancy-related tissues. This compels expression of specific danger signals and potential activation of anti-fetal immunity, which secondarily feeds the syndrome. Study of preeclampsia from this perspective may bring forth novel mechanisms and indicators of vascular and metabolic dysfunction during pregnancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jri.2007.03.006

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonney, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Bonney, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
76
Issue
1-2
Pages
68-74
ISSN
0165-0378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989862594
Cited by
53
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Reproductive Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 043185, R01 047224)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD043185)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
preeclampsia, danger model, maternal immune activation, pregnancy, damage-associated molecular patterns, maternal-fetal immune tolerance, vascular dysfunction, metabolic dysfunction, self/non-self discrimination
MeSH terms
Female, Fetal Death, Fetus, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Models, Biological, Placenta, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, HELLP Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review