Individual differences in reappraisal ability: Links to reappraisal frequency, well-being, and cognitive control
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive reappraisal is thought to depend on psychological flexibility, because flexible attention to and processing of emotional stimuli supports new reappraisals and meanings.
“Important to the present examination, the use of cognitive reappraisal strategies is thought to itself depend on psychological flexibility. The ability to flexibly attend to, modulate, and process emotional stimuli subserves the implementation and maintenance of new reappraisals and meanings (McRae et al., 2012; Malooly et al., 2013; Schmeichel et al., 2008).”
From Prospective examination of the therapeutic role of psychological flexibility and cognitive reappraisal in the ceremonial use of ayahuasca (2022) · cites this paper as McRae et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 486
- Authors
- McRae, K., Jacobs, S. E., Ray, R. D., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-7
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002648053
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- emotion regulation, well-being, cognitive control, working memory capacity, set-shifting, abstract thinking, individual differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
