On rhetoric and ratings: Assessing narrative identity via conceptual coding and self-ratings
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In nonclinical samples, self-ratings and trained coders' ratings of emotional tone have medium to large correlations.
“finding medium to large correlations between self-ratings and trained coders’ ratings”
From Narrative identity in the psychosis spectrum: A systematic review and developmental model (2021) · cites this paper as Dunlop, Harake, et al., 2020
Variation in the specific instructions given to participants may affect their responses.
“suggesting that variation in the specific instructions given to participants may affect their responses (Dunlop, Harake, et al., 2020)”
From Narrative identity in the psychosis spectrum: A systematic review and developmental model (2021) · cites this paper as Dunlop, Harake, et al., 2020
Participants' self-ratings introduce confounding rater effects such as comprehension, motivation, and demand characteristics.
“However, this approach introduces confounding rater effects such as comprehension, motivation, and demand characteristics (Adler et al., 2017; Dunlop, Harake, et al., 2020).”
From Narrative identity in the psychosis spectrum: A systematic review and developmental model (2021) · cites this paper as Dunlop, Harake, et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Dunlop, W. L., Harake, N., Wilkinson, D., & Graham, L. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dunlop, William L.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 103922
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2999965701
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of California Riverside
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- narrative identity, life stories, self-ratings, emotional tone, life satisfaction, turning points
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
