CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Personality Traits and PsychologyBullying, Victimization, and AggressionPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Trait aggression is primarily a facet of antagonism: Evidence from dominance, latent correlational, and item-level analyses

Open access
Chester, David S., West, Samuel J.·2020·Journal of Research in Personality
DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104042PMC PMC7709932
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Trait aggression has been studied for decades and yet remains adrift from broader frameworks of personality such as the Five Factor Model. Across two datasets from undergraduate participants (Study 1: N = 359; Study 2; N = 620), we observed strong manifest and latent correlations between trait aggression and lower agreeableness (i.e., greater antagonism). Trait aggression was also linked to greater neuroticism and lower conscientiousness, but their effect sizes fell beneath our preregistered threshold. Subsequent item-level analyses were unable to articulate trait aggression and agreeableness items into separate factors using the IPIP-NEO, but not the Big Five Inventory. Our findings suggest that trait aggression is accurately characterized as primarily a facet of antagonism, while also reflecting other personality dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104042

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 25

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Allen JJ, & Anderson C (2017). Aggression and violence: Definitions and distinctions In Sturmey P (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Ando A, Soga S, Yamasaki K, Shimai S, Shimada H, Utsuki N, … & Sakai A (1999). Development of the Japanese version of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BAQ). Shinrigaku Kenkyu: The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 70(5), 384– 392. 10756586
  3. Becker G (2007). The Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire: Some unfinished business. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(2), 434– 452.
  4. Berkowitz L (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59– 73. 2667009
  5. Bettencourt BA, Talley A, Benjamin AJ, & Valentine J (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 751– 777. 16910753
  6. Bryant FB, & Smith BD (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(2), 138– 167.
  7. Budescu DV (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542– 551.
  8. Buss AH, & Perry M (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452– 459. 1403624
  9. Chester DS (2017). The role of positive affect in aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 366– 370.
  10. Chester DS, & DeWall CN (2013). Trait aggression In Eastin MS (Ed.), Encyclopedia of media violence (pp. 352– 356). Sage.
  11. Chester DS, DeWall CN, & Enjaian B (2019). Sadism and aggressive behavior: Inflicting pain to feel pleasure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 1252– 1268. 30571456
  12. Chester DS, Lynam DR, Milich R, & DeWall CN (2017). Social rejection magnifies impulsive behavior among individuals with greater negative urgency: An experimental test of urgency theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(7), 962– 967. 28368194 PMC5755962
  13. Chester DS, Lynam DR, Milich R, & DeWall CN (2018). Neural mechanisms of the rejection-aggression link. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(5), 501– 512. 29618118 PMC6007431
  14. Cronbach L, & Meehl P (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281– 302. 13245896
  15. Crowe ML, Lynam DR, & Miller JD (2018). Uncovering the structure of agreeableness from self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 86(5), 771– 787. 29072788
  16. Denson TF, DeWall CN, & Finkel EJ (2012). Self-control and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 20– 25.
  17. DeWall CN, Chester DS, & White DS (2015). Can acetaminophen reduce the pain of decision-making? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 117– 120.
  18. Diamond PM, Wang EW, & Buffington-Vollum J (2005). Factor structure of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) with mentally ill male prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(5), 546– 564.
  19. Digman JM (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417– 440.
  20. Dodge KA, Price JM, Bachorowski JA, & Newman JP (1990). Hostile attributional biases in severely aggressive adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(4), 385– 392. 2266213
  21. Donate APG, Marques LM, Lapenta OM, Asthana MK, Amodio D, & Boggio PS (2017). Ostracism via virtual chat room: Effects on basic needs, anger and pain. PLoS ONE, 12, e0184215. 28877213 PMC5587273
  22. Dunne A, Gilbert F, & Daffern M (2018). Elucidating the relationship between personality disorder traits and aggression using the new DSM-5 dimensional-categorical model for personality disorder. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 615– 629.
  23. Frick PJ, & White SF (2008). Research review: The importance of callous-unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 359– 375. 18221345
  24. Gallagher JM, & Ashford JB (2016). Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire: Testing alternative measurement models with assaultive misdemeanor offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(11), 1639– 1652.
  25. García-León A, Reyes GA, Vila J, Pérez N, Robles H, & Ramos MM (2002). The Aggression Questionnaire: A validation study in student samples. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5(1), 45– 53. 12025365
  26. Gerevich J, Bácskai E, & Czobor P (2007). The generalizability of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16(3), 124– 136. 17849418 PMC6878225
  27. Goldberg LR (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models In Mervielde I, Deary I, De Fruyt F, & Ostendorf F (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7– 28). Tilburg University Press.
  28. Goldberg LR, Johnson JA, Eber HW, Hogan R, Ashton MC, Cloninger CR, & Gough HC (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84– 96.
  29. Gottfredson MR, & Hirschi T (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
  30. Hommel B, Moors A, Sander D, & Deonna J (2017). Emotion meets action: Towards an integration of research and theory. Emotion Review, 9(4), 295– 298.
  31. Huesmann LR, Eron LD, Lefkowitz MM, & Walder LO (1984). Stability of aggression over time and generations. Developmental Psychology, 20(6), 1120– 1134.
  32. John OP, Naumann LP, & Soto CJ (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues In John OP, Robins RW, & Pervin LA (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114– 158). Guilford Press.
  33. John OP, & Srivastava S (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives In Pervin LA & John OP (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102– 138). Guilford Press.
  34. Kraha A, Turner H, Nimon K, Zientek LR, & Henson RK (2012). Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 76– 85. 22457655 PMC3303138
  35. Lynam DR, & Miller JD (2019). The basic trait of antagonism: An unfortunately underappreciated construct. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 118– 126.
  36. Marsee M, Barry C, Childs K, Frick P, Kimonis E, Muñoz L, … & Lau K (2011). Assessing the forms and functions of aggression using self-report: Factor structure and invariance of the Peer Conflict Scale in youths. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 792– 804. 21500922
  37. Nunnally JC (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edition). Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
  38. Raine A, Dodge K, Loeber R, Gatzke-Kopp L, Lynam D, Reynolds C, … & Liu J (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159– 171. 20798781 PMC2927832
  39. Reeder GD, Kumar S, Hesson-McInnis MS, & Trafimow D (2002). Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 789– 803. 12374435
  40. Robins RW, & John OP (1997). The quest for self-insight: Theory and research in accuracy and bias in self-perception In Hogan R, Johnson JA, & Briggs SR (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology, (pp. 649– 680). Academic Press.
  41. Rosseel Y (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more (version 0.6–5) [Software]. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1– 36. Available from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/.
  42. Schwaba T, Rhemtulla M, Hopwood CJ, & Bleidorn W (2020). A facet atlas: Visualizing networks that describe the blends, cores, and peripheries of personality structure. PloS one, 15(7), e0236893. 32730328 PMC7392538
  43. Sharpe JP, & Desai S (2001). The revised NEO Personality Inventory and the MMPI-2 Psychopathology Five in the prediction of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(4), 505– 518.
  44. Soto CJ, & John OP (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84– 90.
  45. Tremblay PF, & Ewart LA (2005). The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(2), 337– 346.
  46. Veenstra L, Bushman BJ, & Koole SL (2018). The facts on the furious: A brief review of the psychology of trait anger. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 98– 103. 29279231
  47. Vize CE, Collison KL, Miller JD, & Lynam DR (2020). The “core” of the dark triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 91– 99. 31815504
  48. Vize CE, Miller JD, & Lynam DR (2018). FFM facets and their relations with different forms of antisocial behavior: An expanded meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57, 67– 75.
  49. Webster GD, DeWall CN, Pond RS, Deckman T, Jonason PK, Le BM, … & Smith CV (2014). The brief aggression questionnaire: Psychometric and behavioral evidence for an efficient measure of trait aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 120– 139. 24115185

Authors
Chester, D. S., & West, S. J.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Chester, David S.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
89
Pages
104042
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104042
PMC
PMC7709932
OpenAlex
W3096692879
Cited by
25
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
trait aggression, antagonism, agreeableness, Big Five personality traits, neuroticism, conscientiousness, dominance, personality facets, IPIP-NEO, Big Five Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review