Cited by 22Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentReligion and Society in Latin AmericaRural Development and Agriculture

Ecological rationality and environmental governance on the agrarian frontier: The role of religion in the Brazilian Amazon

Otsuki, Kei·2013·Journal of Rural Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.09.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Otsuki, K.
Affiliations
United Nations University Institute for Sustainability and Peace (JP)
Corresponding author
Otsuki, Kei
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
32
Pages
411-419
ISSN
0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033669528
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
environmental governance, ecological rationality, religion, Pentecostalism, Catholic Church, agricultural frontier, emancipation movements, state-society relations, livelihoods, local governance, sustainable rural development, Pará

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review