Cited by 59Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentOil Palm Production and SustainabilityLand Rights and Reforms

Colombia’s oil palm development in times of war and ‘peace’: Myths, enablers and the disparate realities of land control

Open access
Potter, Lesley·2020·Journal of Rural Studies

Abstract

Between 1993 and 2015 the land planted to oil palm in Colombia increased fourfold, from 119,000ha to 484,000ha. This rapid growth coincided with a period of extreme armed conflict and displacement, with inequality in land distribution reaching the highest levels in Latin America (Oxfam, 2017). These occurrences spurred this inquiry into conditions on the ground in the palm growing zones and the political and economic forces promoting the crop. The theoretical underpinnings are derived from the literature on land grabbing, land control, land concentration and exclusion. Oil palm has been favoured by rural elites, conservative governments and right-wing paramilitaries in an attempted ‘modernising’ of the countryside through agro-industry. Neo-liberal ideas emphasising capital accumulation through the ‘market’ have minimised land reform efforts and impeded post-conflict land restitution. The paper is organised in three main parts. Part 1 introduces the crop and its importance, linked to oil palm's culture of continuous expansion. Relevant theoretical concepts are discussed, together with the background to land and violence in Colombia. Part 2 begins the more detailed analysis of the palm oil industry. A descriptive survey of historical beginnings, modern data availability and distribution of holdings is followed by a more nuanced analysis of industry-induced ‘myths’ and political ‘enablers’ through the Uribe years (2002–10) and the Santos era (2010–2018). In Part 3 the evidence for ‘stolen land’ is examined in representative oil palm locations. The findings are summarised in the conclusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.035

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Colombia's case is marked by violence-induced displacement due to the guerrillas, their promotion of coca cultivation, and large landholders' hiring of paramilitary groups.

    “Colombia's case, however, is marked by violence-induced displacement due to the guerrillas, their promotion of coca cultivation, and large landholders' hiring of paramilitary groups (Potter, 2020).”

    From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Potter, 2020

    Section 3.1.1 reports violence-induced displacement and says companies invited paramilitaries to take over land; Section 1.2 links guerrilla expansion with coca-growing areas. But the paper does not say guerrillas promoted coca cultivation or that large landholders hired paramilitaries. Its explicit example of mass displacement attributes the violence to paramilitaries, not guerrillas. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While many reasons underlie such displacement, including the new armed conflicts involving paramilitary groups, part of the reason lies with rapid oil palm expansion.

    “While many reasons underlie such displacement, including the new armed conflicts involving paramilitary groups, part of the reason lies with rapid oil palm expansion (Potter, 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Borras, S.M., Franco, J.C., Gomez, S., Kay, C., Spoor, M., 2012. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. J. Peasant Stud. 39 (3-4), 845-872.
  2. Cardenas, R., 2012. Green multiculturalism: articulations of ethnic and environmental politics in a Colombian "black community" J. Peasant Stud. 39 (2), 309-333.
  3. Coronado Delgado, S., Dietz, K., 2013. Controlando territorios, restructurando relaciónes socio-ecologicas: la globalización de agrocombustibles y sus efectos locales, el caso de Montes de María en Colombia. Iberoamericana 49 (2013), 93-115.
  4. Cramer, C., Richards, P., 2011. Violence and war in agrarian perspective. J. Agrar. Change 11 (3), 277-297.
  5. Deininger, K., 1999. Making Negociated land reform work: initial experience from Colombia, Brazil and South Africa. World Dev. 27 (4), 651-672.
  6. Díaz Moreno, I.A., 2016. Paisajes palmeros en los Llanos colombianos: Estado, nostalgia y trabajo en San Martin, Meta. Thesis for Master in Social Anthropology. Universidad Naciónal de Colombia.
  7. EIA Global, 2015. Colombian Land Activist Threatened by Paramilitaries Linked to Oil Palm Company Poligrow. Press Release August 21 2015.
  8. Fajardo, Dario M., 1998. Colombia: reforma agraria en la solución de conflictos armados. pp. 1-16. http://www.mamacoca.org/e_book_Compendio_rural/Dario_Fajardo_ Colombia_Reforma_Agraria.htm, Accessed date: 1 July 2018.
  9. Fedepalma, 2000. La Vision 2020 de la palmicultura colombiana. pp. 10-11 El palmi- cultor (in house journal) septiembre 2000.
  10. Garcia Reyes, P., 2014. Tierra, palma africana y conflicto armado en el Bajo Atrato chocoano, Colombia. Una lectura desde el cambio de los ordenes de extracción. Estud. Socio-Jurid. Bogota 16 (1), 209-244.
  11. Genoud, C., 2017. Ending years of solitude? The round table on sustainable palm oil and access to land in Colombia. In: Paper Presented to the 5th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies, October 13-16, RANEPA Moscow, Russia.
  12. Gomez, J., Sanchez-Ayala, L., Vargas, G., 2015. Armed conflict, land grabs and primitive accumulation in Colombia: micro processes, macro trends and the puzzles in be- tween. J. Peasant Stud. 42 (2), 255-274.
  13. Grajales, J., 2011. The rifle and the title: paramilitary violence, land grab and land control in Colombia. J. Peasant Stud. 38 (4), 771-792.
  14. Grajales, J., 2013. State involvement, land grabbing and counter-insurgency in Colombia. Dev. Change 44 (2), 211-232.
  15. Gutiérrez-Sanin, F., 2010. Land and property rights in Colombia -Change and continuity. Nordic J. Human Rights 28 (2), 230-261.
  16. Hristov, J., 2014. Paramilitarism and Neoliberalism: Violent Systems of Capital Accumulation in Colombia and beyond. Pluto Press, London.
  17. Hurtado, M., Pereira-Villa, C., Villa, E., 2017. Oil palm development and forced dis- placement in Colombia: causal or spurious? Cuadernos Econ. 36 (71), 441-468.
  18. Maher, D., 2015. Rooted in violence: civil war, international trade and the expansion of palm oil in Colombia. New Polit. Econ. 20 (2), 299-330.
  19. Maher, D., Thomson, A., 2011. The terror that underpins the 'peace': the political economy of Colombia's paramilitary demobilisation process. Crit. Stud. Terrorism 4 (1), 95-113.
  20. Marin-Burgos, V., 2014. Access, Power and Justice in Commodity Frontiers: the Political Ecology of Access to Land and Palm Oil Expansion in Colombia. PhD thesis. University of Twente Netherlands.
  21. Maughan, M., 2011. Land grab and oil palm in Colombia. In: Paper Presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing 6-8 April 2011. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
  22. Mesa Dishington, J., 2016. Desafios para la palmicultura colombiana. Revista Palmas 37 (3), 77-82 julio-septiembre 2016.
  23. Mesa Dishington, J., 2017. Principales mensajes del XLV Congreso Nacional de Cultivadores de Palma de Aceite en Barranquilla. In: El Palmicultor Junio 2017 No 544, pp. 6-7.
  24. Ministerio de Agricultura, ICA y Fedepalma, 2014. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, el instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA) y la Federación Nacional de Cultivadores de Palma de Aceite, FEDEPALMA, lanzan hoy la campagna de comunicación fitosanitaria para el sector palmero: "De la mano contra la PC" (press release). .
  25. Mosquera, M., Valderrama, M., Fontanilla, C., Ruiz, E., Unate, M., Rincon, F., Arias, N., 2016. Costos de producción de la agroindustria de la palma de aceite en Colombia en 2014. Palmas 37 (2), 37-53.
  26. Ojeda, D., Petzl, J., Quiroga, C., Rodriguez, A.C., Rojas, J.G., 2015. Paisajes del despojo cotidiano: acaparamiento de tierra y agua en Montes de María, Colombia. pp. 107-119 Temas Varios, rev. estud.soc.No 54 octubre-deciembre.
  27. Oslender, U., 2007. Violence in development: the logic of forced displacement on Colombia's Pacific coast. Dev. Pract. 17 (6), 752-764.
  28. Palacios, P., 2012. Forced displacement: legal versus illegal crops. Defence Peace Econ. 23 (2), 133-160.
  29. Palmas, Revista, 2016b. Palabras del Ministro de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Aurelio Iragorri Valencia' 37 (3), 155-157 julio-septiembre 2016.
  30. Pardo, L., Campbell, M., Edwards, W., Clements, G., Laurance, W., 2018. Terrestrial mammal responses to oil palm dominated landscapes in Colombia. PLoS One 13 (5), e0197539.
  31. Peluso, N.L., Lund, C., 2011. New frontiers of land control: introduction. J. Peasant Stud. 38 (4), 667-681.
  32. Potter, L., 2015. Colombia. Occasional paper No 122 In: Managing Palm Oil Landscapes : A Seven Country Survey of the Modern Palm Oil Industry in Southeast Asia, Latin America and West Africa. CIFOR [Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, pp. 41-59.
  33. Revista Palmas, 2016a. Contradictions in Colombia's public policies for the agricultural sector: oil palm agro-industry requires better and greater support (English versión). abril-junio 37 (2), 7-8 2016.
  34. Rey Sabogal, C., 2013. Analisis Espacial de la Correlación entre cultivo de Palma de Aceite y Desplazamiento Forzado en Colombia. Cuadernos de Economia 32 (61), 683-718.
  35. Richani, N., 2010. Colombia: predatory state and rentier political economy. Labour Capital Soc. 43 (2), 121-145.
  36. Richani, N., 2012. The agrarian rentier political economy: land concentration and food insecurity in Colombia. Latin Am. Res. Rev. 47 (2), 51-78.
  37. Rodriguez Gonzalez, I., 2014. Despojo, baldios y conflicto armado en Puerto Gaitan y Mapiripán (Meta, Colombia) entre 1980 y 2010. Estudios Socio-Juridicos 16 (1), 315-342.
  38. Salinas, Y., 2012. In: Soto Baquero, F., Gomez, S. (Eds.), 'El Caso de Colombia' in Dinamicas del Mercado de la Tierra en America Latina y el Caribe: Concentración y Extranjerización. FAO.
  39. Seeboldt, S., 2010. Palm Oil in Colombia: Shifting Power Play. pp. 17-39
  40. Thomson, F., 2011. The agrarian question and violence in Colombia: conflict and de- velopment. J. Agrar. Change 11 (3), 321-356.
  41. Torres, G.A., Sarria, G.A., Martinez, G., Varon, F., Drenth, A., Guest, D.I., 2016. Bud rot caused by Phytophthora palmivora: A Destructive Emerging Disease of Oil Palm. Phytopathology 106 (4), 320-329.
  42. Vargas, J., Uribe, S., 2017. State, war and land dispossession: the multiple paths to land concentration. J. Agrarian Stud. 17 (4), 2017.

Authors
Potter, L.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Potter, Lesley
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
78
Pages
491-502
ISSN
0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007917295
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Centre for International Forestry Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
Keywords
oil palm, land grabbing, land control, land concentration, armed conflict, displacement, rural elites, right-wing paramilitaries, neoliberalism, land reform, Colombia, Uribe government, agroindustry, land inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review