Cited by 0Agriculture and Farm SafetyStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Burnout among female farmers and farm workers in Germany - Results of an online cross-sectional survey

Open access
Niens, Christine, Padel, Susanne, Davier, Zazie v.·2026·Journal of Rural Studies

Abstract

The mental health of farmers has been receiving increasing attention in recent years. While studies are available in many European and non-European countries, there is a lack of corresponding data in Germany. This study therefore examines the prevalence of burnout among women on farms in Germany and the relationship to various, partly gender-specific, risk factors. The study uses data of an online survey of 7345 women that was conducted in 2021. The risk of burnout was measured using the “Personal Burnout Scale” of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). The results show that 21.5% of women on farms in Germany represented in this sample suffer from burnout, with non-family employees without management functions showing a particularly high burnout rate of 27%. The strongest associations with the CBI Burnout Score were observed for self-rated general health status, stress related to household and farm work, lack of free time, and family and generational conflicts. However, the comparability of the present results with previous studies is unclear due to the potential influence of the COVID-19 pandemic at the time of data collection. It cannot be ruled out that the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, such as isolation, fear of illness, and financial uncertainty, may have biased the data. Nevertheless, the study is the first Germany-wide survey of the prevalence of burnout among women in agriculture, and therefore offers initial important insights into a previously under-researched topic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104360

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Niens, C., Padel, S., & Davier, Z. V.
Affiliations
Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
Niens, Christine
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-09
Volume
127
Pages
104360
ISSN
0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7204524233
Cited by
0
References
22
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Federal Agency for Agriculture and Food
  • Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout, women in agriculture, women farmers, farm workers, gender differences, mental health, risk factors, household stress, family conflict, intergenerational conflict, leisure, self-rated health, COVID-19 pandemic, Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review