The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of global positioning and computer-based tracking systems for measuring player movement distance during Australian Football
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Reliability of MinimaxX Accelerometers for Measuring Physical Activity in Australian Football
Boyd, L. J., Ball, K., & Aughey, R. J. (2011) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.6.3.311 · Cited by 556
Evolution of World Cup Soccer Final Games 1966-2010: Game Structure, Speed and Play Patterns
Wallace, J. L., & Norton, K. I. (2014) · Journal of science and medicine in sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.03.016 · Cited by 285
McLellan, C. P., Lovell, D. I., & Gass, G. C. (2010) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181c1fcb1 · Cited by 153
Gastin, P. B., Hunkin, S. L., Fahrner, B., & Robertson, S. (2019) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003023 · Cited by 82
Loveday, A., Sherar, L. B., Sanders, J. P., Sanderson, P. W., & Esliger, D. W. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4761 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Edgecomb, S. J., & Norton, K. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 25-32
- ISSN
- 1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163245413
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.