Cited by 13Stress and Burnout ResearchSport Psychology and PerformanceOccupational Health and Burnout

Tracking the mental health outcomes of occupational burnout with Australian Rules Football coaches: A 2-year longitudinal study

Ruddock, S., Rahimi-Golkhanden, S., Ruddock-Hudson, M., Wollersheim, D.·2019·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the included studies, 5 were classified as either a professional abstract or editorial letter.

    “Of the included studies, 5 were classified as either a professional abstract [78–81] or editorial letter [82].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruddock, S., Rahimi-Golkhanden, S., Ruddock-Hudson, M., & Wollersheim, D.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ruddock, S.
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
22
Pages
S52
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2978893723
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
occupational burnout, mental health, psychological distress, longitudinal trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review