Cited by 52Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesInnovations in Medical EducationOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Web-based training for primary care providers on screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs

Open access
Stoner, Susan A., Mikko, A. Tasha, Carpenter, Kelly M.·2014·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

This project evaluated a Web-based multimedia training for primary care providers in screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. Physicians (n = 37), physician assistants (n = 35), and nurse practitioners (n = 20) were recruited nationally by email and randomly assigned to online access to either the multimedia training or comparable reading materials. At baseline, compared to non-physicians, physicians reported lower self-efficacy for counseling patients regarding substance use and doing so less frequently. All provider types in both conditions showed significant increases in SBIRT-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and clinical practices. Although the multimedia training was not superior to the reading materials with regard to these outcomes, the multimedia training was more likely to be completed and rated more favorably. Findings indicate that SBIRT training does not have to be elaborate to be effective. However, multimedia training may be more appealing to the target audiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.06.009

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoner, S. A., Mikko, A. T., & Carpenter, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Talaria (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
362-370
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145590344
Cited by
52
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (HHSN271200900035C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
SBIRT, online training, primary care providers, substance use screening, brief intervention, referral to treatment, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, other drugs, self-efficacy, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, multimedia training, continuing education
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Continuing, Humans, Mass Screening, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Substance-Related Disorders, Self Efficacy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review